Effect of Nd:YAG laser-assisted non-surgical mechanical debridement on clinical and radiographic peri-implant inflammatory parameters in patients with peri-implant disease

Abduljabbar, Tariq; Javed, Fawad; Kellesarian, Sergio Varela; Vohra, Fahim; Romanos, Georgios E.

doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2017.01.015

Cited by 28 publications

(75 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Based on the above mentioned grade scale, all the included studies were assessed as “high quality” studies with scores of 4 or 5 [ 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 ]. One study was graded 4 [ 70 ], due to missing radiographic data during the follow-up.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Renvert et al [ 65 ], did not provide measurements at three months. Abduljabar et al [ 66 ] reported the plaque index (PI) ( p < 0.05), bleeding on probing (BOP) ( p < 0.05) and pocket depths (PD) ( p < 0.05) between groups at three months. Similarly, Romeo et al [ 67 ] reported better clinical parameters at three months, but no p -values were available.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regarding the final treatment outcome at six months, Renvert et al [ 65 ] reported p = 0.22 for BOP, and p = 0.55 for PD compared to the control group. Abduljabbar et al [ 66 ] reported p > 0.05 for PI, BOP, and PD between the groups.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Therefore, there is strong scientific evidence that, regarding non-surgical treatment, adjunct laser application can provide some better results after three months, but no significant improvement after six months compared to conventional treatment [ 65 , 66 , 67 ].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Adjunctive Use of Lasers in Peri-Implant Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis Treatment: A Systematic Review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The aim of this systematic review is to compare the effectiveness of lasers in the treatment of implant mucositis and peri-implantitis compared to conventional treatment (non-surgical or surgical: resective or regenerative). Methods: Sources of PubMed, Cochrane and Google Scholar search engines were used on articles published from 1997 to 2020 in English, with selected keyword criteria applied. Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were selected. Results: All included studies were considered of “high quality” according to the quality assessment scale. The comparative assessment of the RCTs was done twice for each RCT based on the type of treatment and according to wavelength. There is strong scientific evidence that, regarding non-surgical treatment, adjunct laser application can provide better results only in the short term (three months). Regarding the surgical approach, the method of decontamination plays a subordinate role. All wavelengths/applications presented similar results. Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, the adjunctive use of lasers in the treatment of peri-implant inflammation is effective for up to three months; there is no strong evidence regarding the long term benefit compared to conventional treatment.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Adjunctive Use of Lasers in Peri-Implant Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis Treatment: A Systematic Review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Results from this study noted a significant improvement in aPDT group that correlated with reduced IL‐10, IL‐1β, and increased anti‐inflammatory cytokine, IL‐4. Recently, Abduljabbar, Javed, Kellesarian, Vohra, and Romanos () reported on the effectiveness of non‐surgical Nd:YAG (1,064 nm) laser treatment in peri‐implantitis. They report that the use of aPDT in periodontal treatment appears to have significant benefits on disinfection of periodontal pathogens.…”

Section: Photodynamic Therapy In Oral Diseasesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Learning from clinical phenotypes: Low‐dose biophotonics therapies in oral diseases

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This narrative review on the use of biophotonics therapies for management of oral diseases is written as a tribute to Prof. Crispian Scully. His seminal contributions to the field are highlighted by the detailed, comprehensive description of clinical presentations of oral diseases. This has enabled a more thorough, fundamental understanding of many of these pathologies by research from his group as well as inspired mechanistic investigations in many groups globally. In the same vein, a major emphasis of this narrative review is to focus on the evidence from human case reports rather than in vitro or in vivo animal studies that showcases the growing and broad impact of biophotonics therapies. The similarities and differences between two distinct forms of low-dose biophotonics treatments namely photodynamic therapy and photobiomodulation therapy are discussed. As evident in this review, a majority of these reports provide promising evidence for their clinical efficacy. However, a lack of adequate technical details, precise biological rationale, and limited outcome measures limits the current utility of these treatments. Future investigations should attempt to address these shortcomings and develop better designed, rigorous, controlled studies to fully harness the tremendous potential of low-dose biophotonics therapies.

show abstract

Rare earth smart nanomaterials for bone tissue engineering and implantology: Advances, challenges, and prospects

Duraipandy

Wang

et al. 2021

Bioengineering & Transla Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bone grafts or prosthetic implant designing for clinical application is challenging due to the complexity of integrated physiological processes. The revolutionary advances of nanotechnology in the biomaterial field expedite and endorse the current unresolved complexity in functional bone graft and implant design. Rare earth (RE) materials are emerging biomaterials in tissue engineering due to their unique biocompatibility, fluorescence upconversion, antimicrobial, antioxidants, and anti‐inflammatory properties. Researchers have developed various RE smart nano‐biomaterials for bone tissue engineering and implantology applications in the past two decades. Furthermore, researchers have explored the molecular mechanisms of RE material‐mediated tissue regeneration. Recent advances in biomedical applications of micro or nano‐scale RE materials have provided a foundation for developing novel, cost‐effective bone tissue engineering strategies. This review attempted to provide an overview of RE nanomaterials' technological innovations in bone tissue engineering and implantology and summarized the osteogenic, angiogenic, immunomodulatory, antioxidant, in vivo bone tissue imaging, and antimicrobial properties of various RE nanomaterials, as well as the molecular mechanisms involved in these biological events. Further, we extend to discuss the challenges and prospects of RE smart nano‐biomaterials in the field of bone tissue engineering and implantology.

show abstract

Effect of Nd:YAG laser-assisted non-surgical mechanical debridement on clinical and radiographic peri-implant inflammatory parameters in patients with peri-implant disease

Cited by 28 publications

References 27 publications

Adjunctive Use of Lasers in Peri-Implant Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis Treatment: A Systematic Review

Adjunctive Use of Lasers in Peri-Implant Mucositis and Peri-Implantitis Treatment: A Systematic Review

Learning from clinical phenotypes: Low‐dose biophotonics therapies in oral diseases

Rare earth smart nanomaterials for bone tissue engineering and implantology: Advances, challenges, and prospects

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About