2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.11.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of natural and synthetic noise on evoked vocal responses in a frog of the temperate austral forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
2
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
2
73
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, temporal changes of a call can make it more perceptible and reduce the intra-or interspecific acoustic interference in complex choruses (Bastos and Haddad, 1995;Bee et al, 2001;Penna et al, 2005;Bastos et al, 2011). In S. constrictus, acoustic parameters did not vary among the years, most likely due to a low amount of genetic exchange between the populations, which would keep acoustic param eters similar among breeding seasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…However, temporal changes of a call can make it more perceptible and reduce the intra-or interspecific acoustic interference in complex choruses (Bastos and Haddad, 1995;Bee et al, 2001;Penna et al, 2005;Bastos et al, 2011). In S. constrictus, acoustic parameters did not vary among the years, most likely due to a low amount of genetic exchange between the populations, which would keep acoustic param eters similar among breeding seasons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…480 to 860 Hz in average; L. pipiens: from 850 to 1200 Hz at average; Cunnington & Fahrig 2010). Penna et al (2005) showed that Eupsophus calcaratus increased call duration and call rate in response to abiotic background noise (wind, rain, creek and sea surf), and they suggested these vocal responses are adaptations that allow frogs to cope with high interference with sounds produced by the local acoustic environment.…”
Section: Social Context and Acoustic Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daily and seasonal changes in climate conditions, such as temperature and wind, can also result in concordant patterns across modalities [17,27]. Wind, for instance, can result in higher noise levels, more substrate vibrations and increased visual motion, thus simultaneously affecting multiple senses [28][29][30]. Multimodal covariance may also occur across space.…”
Section: Environmental Sensory Conditions and Covariance Among Modalimentioning
confidence: 99%