2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.07.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of nano-structural properties of biomimetic hydroxyapatite on osteoimmunomodulation

Abstract: Immune cells are sensitive to the microstructural and textural properties of materials. Tuning the structural features of synthetic bone grafts could be a valuable strategy to regulate the specific response of the immune system, which in turn modulates the activity of bone cells. The aim of this study was to analyse the effect of the structural characteristics of biomimetic calcium deficient hydroxyapatite (CDHA) on the innate immune response of macrophages and the subsequent impact on osteogenesis and osteocl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
65
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
3
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We recently showed through an in vitro study that tuning the nanostructural features of CDHA is an effective method to control the response of immune cells. 15 This is in line with other in vitro studies that have demonstrated that the size and shape of nanocrystals in nanostructured biomaterials exert a direct effect on cells involved in osteoinduction. [16][17][18][19] However, these results cannot be extrapolated to the very different in vivo scenario.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We recently showed through an in vitro study that tuning the nanostructural features of CDHA is an effective method to control the response of immune cells. 15 This is in line with other in vitro studies that have demonstrated that the size and shape of nanocrystals in nanostructured biomaterials exert a direct effect on cells involved in osteoinduction. [16][17][18][19] However, these results cannot be extrapolated to the very different in vivo scenario.…”
supporting
confidence: 89%
“…We observed that macrophages were sensitive to the nanostructural features and, when cultured on needle-like Fine-CDHA substrates, the cytokines generated by macrophages were able to trigger osteoblastic differentiation and osteogenesis. 15 Regarding the degradation behavior, large differences were observed between the different foams, despite the identical or similar chemical composition between groups. Coarse-CDHA foams, with the lowest SSA, were the least resorbable scaffolds, being the only group where scaffold resorption did not progress overtime ( Figure 6A).…”
Section: Effect Of Nanostructure and Carbonate Doping On Osteoinductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…4). 100 In addition, Jin et al also have demonstrated that the immune response of macrophages could be stimulated through some physicochemical properties of nanostructured biomaterial scaffolds. 65 They have showed the biomimetic hierarchical nanointerface can facilitate M2 macrophage polarization and interleukin-4 secretion to promote stem cell osteogenesis and endogenous bone regeneration.…”
Section: Biological Behaviors Underlying Nano/ Microstructure Of Biommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F-CDHA and C-CDHA, might produce different ionic fluctuations and thereby affect the cellular behaviour to different extents. Another interesting issue is that expected ionic fluctuations might vary depending of medium composition [34,36] as well as presence or not of cells [39] . In the latter case, the layer of cells might reduce the exposure of the substrate to different extents depending on the degree of surface coverage, which in turn would decrease the ionic exchange.…”
Section: Proliferation Of Repcs and Rmscs On The Different Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%