Effect of Music Training and Musical Complexity on Focus of Attention to Melody or Harmony

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationships between music training and musical complexity and focus of attention to melody or harmony. Participants ( N= 192) were divided into four groups: university jazz majors ( n= 64), other university music majors ( n= 64), high school instrumentalists ( n= 32), and junior high instrumentalists ( n= 32). The musical complexity variable consisted of four levels of melodic complexity and four levels of harmonic complexity each paired for a total of 16 possible combinations all heard by each participant. Each trial consisted of a melodic complexity/harmonic complexity pairing performed by the same performer on jazz piano. Subjects indicated their overall perceived focus of attention for melody or harmony either during or immediately after they listened. A four-factor ANOVA was conducted with two between-subjects factors (order and music-training groups) and two within-subjects factors (melodic complexity and harmonic complexity). Significant differences were found for focus of attention for both melodic complexity and harmonic complexity. Significant interactions occurred between music training and focus of attention. Overall, data showed that as music training increases, so does harmonic focus of attention. March 11, 2005 October 4, 2005

Connecting chord progressions with specific pieces of music

“…On the one hand, the use of chord labels or other conceptual labels in harmonic analysis can allow professionals to label chords in our block-chord stimuli and associate those labels with declarative knowledge about what pieces use those chords. On the other hand, increasing attention to chord progressions (Cullimore, 1999; Farbood, 2012; Williams, 2004) during practice (e.g., playing chords on an instrument) is likely to increase listeners’ general interest in harmony. Additionally, Wolpert (2000) found that musicians not only tend to pay more attention to harmony than non-musicians, but also tend to be more sensitive to it.…”

“…One of the main challenges in studying how listeners mentally process harmony is not only that harmonic activity always entails some type of melodic and rhythmic activity, but that in most listening scenarios, melody and rhythm tend to be more perceptually salient than harmony (Cullimore, 1999; Farbood, 2012; Halpern, 1984; Mélen & Deliège, 1995; Williams, 2004). The perceptual prominence of rhythm and its influence on the mental processing of harmonic activity has traditionally been minimized in experimental settings by using moderately slow streams of same-duration events.…”

Melodic Contour Similarity Using Folk Melodies

“…As discussed by Schmuckler (1999), musical, or in this case melodic, complexity is, in and of itself, a psychologically intricate concept-one that has been a topic of a great deal of research in its own right (Arkes, Rettig, & Scougale, 1986;Conley, 1981;Eerola et al, 2006;Konečni, 1982;Rohner, 1985;Williams, 2004). Accordingly, the divergence between these sets of ratings might highlight those factors that are intrinsic to the notion of melodic complexity, but have little to do with contour structure per se.…”

Prevalence of vocal problems: Speech-language pathologists’ evaluation of music and non-music teacher recordings

“…Participants register responses by manipulation of a dial across a negative/positive continuum over a 256 degree arc. In nearly two decades of research, the CRDI has been shown to measure various responses to musical stimuli, including tension (Fredrickson, 2001), aesthetic response (Geringer & Madsen, 2003), song recognition and likeability (Parisi, 2004), and focus of attention to melody and harmony (Williams, 2005).…”