Effect of Music Therapy on Hospital Induced Anxiety and Health Related Quality of Life in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Ashok, Abeeshna; Shanmugam, Sukumar; Soman, Ajith

doi:10.7860/jcdr/2019/42725.13274

Cited by 5 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Data from 26 eligible studies and 779 total participants (mean [SD] age, 60 [11] years) were included in the present study (eFigure 1, eTables 1 and 2 in the Supplement ). Included studies were conducted in Australia, 25 Brazil, 26 , 27 , 28 China (Hong Kong SAR), 29 Germany, 30 India, 31 Italy, 32 , 33 , 34 The Netherlands, 35 , 36 Spain, 37 Sweden, 38 Thailand, 39 Turkey, 40 the United Kingdom, 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 and the US. 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 Included studies comprised 22 investigations of clinical populations and 4 of healthy populations (10 investigations examined music listening, 7 music therapy, 8 singing, and 1 gospel music intervention) and 20 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and 6 single-group studies (8 RCTs included comparisons with a usual treatment control group, 3 RCTs used meditation control groups, and 9 RCTs used a range of other disparate control groups).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association of Music Interventions With Health-Related Quality of Life

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Key Points Question Are music-making and listening interventions associated with positive changes in health-related quality of life? Findings This systematic review and meta-analysis of 26 studies comprising 779 individuals found that music interventions were associated with statistically and clinically significant changes in mental HRQOL, both preintervention to postintervention as well as when music interventions were added to treatment as usual vs treatment as usual control groups. Meaning These results suggest that associations between music interventions and clinically significant changes in HRQOL are demonstrable in comprehensive reviews of previous studies.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Association of Music Interventions With Health-Related Quality of Life

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Data from 25 eligible studies and N=764 total participants (mean age = 60 (standard deviation=11 years)) were included in the present study (Figure 1)(see Supplementary Appendix for full details of excluded studies). Included studies were conducted in Australia, 22 Brazil, [23][24][25] China (Hong Kong SAR), 26 Germany, 27 India, 28 Italy, [29][30][31] The Netherlands, 32,33 Spain, 34 Sweden, 35 Thailand, 36 Turkey, 37 the United Kingdom, [38][39][40][41] and the United States. [42][43][44][45][46] Included studies were comprised of: 21 investigations of clinical populations and 4 of healthy populations; 10 investigations of music listening, 7 music therapy, 7 singing, and 1 'gospel music' intervention; 19 RCTs and 6 single-group studies; 8 RCTs included comparisons to a 'treatment as usual' control group, 3 RCTs used meditation control groups, and 8 RCTs used a range of other disparate control groups.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The impact of music on health-related quality of life, as quantified by the SF-36: A systematic review and meta-analysis

McCrary

Altenmüller

Kretschmer

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background/ObjectivesIncreasing evidence supports the ability of music to broadly promote wellbeing and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). However, the magnitude of music’s effects on HRQOL is still unclear, particularly relative to established interventions, limiting inclusion of music interventions in health policy and care. The SF-36 is the most widely used instrument to evaluate HRQOL, with broad validity in evaluating the effects of a range of interventions. This study aims to synthesize and contextualize the impact of music interventions on HRQOL, as assessed by the SF-36.MethodsMEDLINE; EMBASE; Web of Science; PsycINFO, clinicaltrials.gov, and ICTRP databases were searched on 30 July 2021. Randomized and single-group studies of music interventions which reported SF-36 data at pre- and post-intervention timepoints were included. Observational studies were excluded. The quality and certainty of evidence provided by included articles and meta-analysis results was appraised using GRADE. Inverse variance random effects meta-analyses quantified changes in SF-36 mental and physical component summary scores (respectively, ‘MCS’ and ‘PCS’) pre- to post-intervention and vs. common control groups.ResultsAnalyses included 764 participants from 25 studies. Music interventions (music listening – 10 studies; music therapy – 7 studies; singing – 7 studies; gospel music – 1 study) significantly improved MCS (Mean difference (MD) [95% confidence interval]=3.0 [1.4, 4.6]; p<.001) and PCS (MD=1.0 [0.1, 2.0; p<.04) scores. In a subgroup (8 studies; music group – N=254; control – N=257) addition of music to standard treatment for a range of conditions significantly improved MCS scores vs. standard treatment alone (MD=3.7 [0.4, 7.1; p<.03). Effects did not vary between music listening, therapy and singing intervention types or doses (p≥.12); no evidence of small study or publication biases was present in any analysis (p≥.31). Music’s impact on MCS scores meets SF-36 minimum important difference thresholds (MD≥3) and is within the range of established interventions.ConclusionsThis study provides Moderate quality evidence that music interventions can generally be used to provide clinically meaningful improvements in HRQOL. Further study is needed to determine optimal music interventions and doses for distinct clinical and public health scenarios.FundingAlexander von Humboldt FoundationRegistrationPROSPERO (ID: CRD42021276204)

show abstract

“…También se ha comprobado la eficacia y el impacto positivo de la musicoterapia sobre la ansiedad en pacientes que padecían patologías cardiovasculares (Ashok et al, 2019).…”

Section: Bienestar Y Calidad De Vidaunclassified

“…El número de programas que tratan la salud mental a través de la musicoterapia son diez (20%). Los síntomas que trabajan son la ansiedad (Archambault et al, 2019;Ashok et al, 2019;Travis Junior et al, 2019), la calidad de vida (Hall et al, 2019), la depresión (Kayak et al, 2016;Perkins et al, 2016;Rosado, 2019;Travis Junior et al, 2019), y el bienestar (Kwok, 2019;Windle et al, 2020). En la recuperación de los jóvenes, la intervención a través de la musicoterapia proporciona un medio eficaz y adaptativo para la regulación de los estados de ánimo (Archambault et al, 2019;Rosado, 2019).…”

Section: Salud Mentalunclassified

“…Las ventajas que produce la música se pueden aprovechar en determinadas terapias como tratamiento coadyuvante. La mayoría de los programas de musicoterapia se dirigen a personas adultas y tercera edad fundamentalmente ligados a salud mental (Archambault et al, 2019;Ashok et al, 2019;Travis Junior et al, 2019;Hall et al, 2019;Kayak et al, 2016;Perkins et al, 2016;Rosado, 2019;Kwok, 2019;Windle et al, 2020), y calidad de vida en enfermedades crónicas (Calo et al, 2020;Millar et al, 2020;Ford et al, 2018;MacRitchie et al, 2020;Fujita et al, 2016;Giuli et al, 2020;Sheppard & Broughton, 2020;Uhlig et al, 2016;Johnson et al, 2020;Riggins & McLennon, 2020). y degenerativas (Castro et al, 2020;Domínguez-Chávez et al, 2019;Skingley et al, 2020;Wang et al, 2020;Gulliver et al, 2019).…”

Section: Discusión Y Conclusionesunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Eficacia de los programas de musicoterapia: un metanálisis cualitativo

González-Ojea

Domínguez-Lloria

Juste

2021

Cad. Bras. Ter. Ocup.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumen El aumento de enfermedades transmisibles justifica la necesidad de verificar la eficacia no farmacológica de los tratamientos alternativos. La música promueve las interacciones sociales y el trabajo en grupo, ayuda en varios aspectos del aprendizaje humano, la emoción y la memoria, y puede convertirse en una herramienta terapéutica complementaria. El objetivo de este estudio fue analizar la evidencia de la eficacia de la musicoterapia como tratamiento no farmacológico mediante un diseño descriptivo retrospectivo utilizando como parámetros de búsqueda: “musicoterapia” o “programas musicales” y “salud” en las bases de datos Scopus y Web of Science. Entre los principales resultados, destacamos que los programas de intervención que utilizan la música como tratamiento coadyuvante no farmacológico en enfermedades no transmisibles ofrecen resultados positivos y significativos sobre la mejora de las patologías en las que interviene. A partir de estos resultados, sería importante ampliar la formación de los profesionales de la salud en la aplicación de técnicas basadas en el arte y específicamente en la musicoterapia.

show abstract

Effect of Music Therapy on Hospital Induced Anxiety and Health Related Quality of Life in Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Patients: A Randomised Controlled Trial

Cited by 5 publications

References 0 publications

Association of Music Interventions With Health-Related Quality of Life

Association of Music Interventions With Health-Related Quality of Life

The impact of music on health-related quality of life, as quantified by the SF-36: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Eficacia de los programas de musicoterapia: un metanálisis cualitativo

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About