1990
DOI: 10.2514/3.45894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of moving surfaces on the airfoil boundary-layer control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The exact speed at which separation is completely suppressed was not determined, but the numerical results showed that even at terminal velocity ratio n = 0.6, the flow was not separating from the cylinder. The results verified expectations that separation would be suppressed based on the early work reported by Prandtl and Tietjens (1957) and Goldstein (1965), and the more recent work reported by Modi et al (1990Modi et al ( , 1991aModi et al ( , 1991b and Munshi et al (1996).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The exact speed at which separation is completely suppressed was not determined, but the numerical results showed that even at terminal velocity ratio n = 0.6, the flow was not separating from the cylinder. The results verified expectations that separation would be suppressed based on the early work reported by Prandtl and Tietjens (1957) and Goldstein (1965), and the more recent work reported by Modi et al (1990Modi et al ( , 1991aModi et al ( , 1991b and Munshi et al (1996).…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…When the cylinder was rotated, separation was eliminated around the corner of the block. In more recent studies, Modi et al (1990Modi et al ( , 1991b showed how rotating cylinders at certain points along an airfoil controlled separation and resulted in increased lift and stall angles for the foil. Modi et al (1991a) investigated the flow past bluff bodies.…”
Section: Background*mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The values of lift and drag coefficients are presented in Table 6, which indicates that the results for two slot geome-try types are strongly closed, whereas the vortexes passing the airfoil are different. The slot geometry of type 1 models the moving surface (wall motion) over the airfoils [40,41] rather than the tangential blowing. Blowing is defined as a method of preventing separation to supply additional energy to the particles of fluid being retarded in the boundary layer [3].…”
Section: Slot Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modi [1] carried out tests on rotating cylinders located at the leading and trailing edge of the airfoil. The leading edge rotating cylinder extended the lift curve without affecting its slope thus increasing the maximum lift and delaying stall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%