2015
DOI: 10.1080/01924788.2015.994467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Motor Versus Cognitive Secondary Tasks on Performance of Stair Descent in Community-Dwelling Older Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence produces greater instability than the normal stair descent. This increased value of time taken and OSPS score in secondary motor task is similar to the findings of the study by Yadav M et al 17 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence produces greater instability than the normal stair descent. This increased value of time taken and OSPS score in secondary motor task is similar to the findings of the study by Yadav M et al 17 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…And the secondary tasks were more complex and less familiar than the primary task, so the participants required higher attention resources to descend stairs with secondary tasks. And a large proportion of attention was directed towards the secondary tasks at the expense of the performance of stair descent 17 . Thus the results of this study show similarities and differences with other studies conducted on patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the secondary tasks were more complicated and less familiar than the primary task, so the participants required higher attention resources to descend stairs with secondary tasks. Attention was directed more towards the secondary tasks as compared to the task of stair descent [19] . Thus the results of this study show similarities and differences with other studies conducted on patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%