2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of mono- and di-valent cations on PFAS removal from water using foam fractionation – A modelling and experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
24
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
24
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An important limitation of foam fractionation is the low removal efficiency of short-chain PFAS. 3 , 33 , 38 , 40 42 Metal cation activators can be used to increase the removal, but this effect has not been shown for short-chain substances. 38 , 40 , 43 ΣPFAS removal has further been shown to increase for increasing aeration time, 3 , 38 , 40 , 42 gas flow rate, 3 , 32 , 33 , 40 and ionic strength 3 , 38 , 42 and for decreasing initial PFAS concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…An important limitation of foam fractionation is the low removal efficiency of short-chain PFAS. 3 , 33 , 38 , 40 42 Metal cation activators can be used to increase the removal, but this effect has not been shown for short-chain substances. 38 , 40 , 43 ΣPFAS removal has further been shown to increase for increasing aeration time, 3 , 38 , 40 , 42 gas flow rate, 3 , 32 , 33 , 40 and ionic strength 3 , 38 , 42 and for decreasing initial PFAS concentration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 3 , 33 , 38 , 40 42 Metal cation activators can be used to increase the removal, but this effect has not been shown for short-chain substances. 38 , 40 , 43 ΣPFAS removal has further been shown to increase for increasing aeration time, 3 , 38 , 40 , 42 gas flow rate, 3 , 32 , 33 , 40 and ionic strength 3 , 38 , 42 and for decreasing initial PFAS concentration. 3 , 42 , 43 However, for low initial PFAS concentrations (<50 ng L –1 ), removal was instead observed to increase at increasing concentration for a wide range of compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The knowledge of interfacial dynamic properties of surfactant-adsorbed layers in the presence of inorganic electrolytes is essential for many industries dealing with foaming, emulsification and coating, such as pharmaceuticals [1], mining [2][3][4], environmental remediation [5,6], food [7,8] and biology [9,10], enhanced oil recovery [11] and gas well deliquification [12][13][14][15]. The stability of foam/emulsion is strongly influenced by surface properties of gas-fluid interfaces containing adsorbed surface-active compounds such as surfactants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noted that the trials of Burns et al were for a “hard” water system, and Brusseau and Van Glubt (2019) show that the presence of electrolytes can significantly enhance the adsorption coefficient, and Wang and Niven (2021) provide a theoretical explanation. Moreover, Buckley, Karanam, et al (2022) have directly demonstrated that the presence of electrolytes improves the removal of PFAS by foam fractionation. Thus, the adsorption coefficients of Brusseau (2019) will not manifest in a practical remediation situation, but the actual adsorption coefficients are likely to follow a similar trend.…”
Section: Field Trial Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%