2017
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b08162
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Molybdenum Incorporation on the Structure and Magnetic Properties of Cobalt Ferrite

Abstract: Melendez, A.; Manadhar, S.; Singamaneni, S. R.; Reddy, Kongara M.; Gandha, Kinjal H.; Niebedim, I. C.; and Ramana, C. V., "Effect of Molybdenum Incorporation on the Structure and Magnetic Properties of Cobalt Ferrite" (2017). Ames Laboratory Accepted Manuscripts. 61. AbstractWe report on the effect of molybdenum (Mo) incorporation on the crystal structure, surface morphology, Mo chemical valence state, and magnetic properties of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4, referred to CFO). Molybdenum incorporated cobalt ferrite … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The density and atomic weight of Mo 3+ are 10.28 g/cm 3 and 95.94, which are greater than those of Fe 3+ 7.874 g/cm 3 and 55.845. Thus, the overall density increase of CCMF compounds can attribute to the fact that the density and atomic weight of Mo are higher than those of Fe for which the Mo ions are substituting or replacing in CCMF [21]. Furthermore, the crystallite sizes are in good agreement with the TEM analysis results of the CCMF.…”
Section: Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The density and atomic weight of Mo 3+ are 10.28 g/cm 3 and 95.94, which are greater than those of Fe 3+ 7.874 g/cm 3 and 55.845. Thus, the overall density increase of CCMF compounds can attribute to the fact that the density and atomic weight of Mo are higher than those of Fe for which the Mo ions are substituting or replacing in CCMF [21]. Furthermore, the crystallite sizes are in good agreement with the TEM analysis results of the CCMF.…”
Section: Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Their exposure to a magnetic eld from the outside is enormous and promising. Magnetic elds attract them, and they can retain their magnetic properties even when the external eld is removed [21]. Such a ferrite materials used in magnetic sensors, transformer cores, biomedical sensors, solar energy conversion, energy storage media, antenna rods, recording heads, microwave systems, magnetic cooling, ferro uids, drug delivery, cellular therapy, tissue repair, gas detectors , hyperthermia treatment, Nano-oil, oxygen-content-control, magnetic relaxation, strain energy can be used with spinel ferrite [22-30, 32, 34] [41].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lattice parameters (a = b = c) and the crystallite size of CFMo were estimated to be 8.3523 Å and 22.81 nm, respectively. The lattice parameters value is slightly higher than that reported for Mo-doped CoFe 2 O 4 (8.3352 Å) (Orozco et al, 2017). Figure 2(c) represents the XRD pattern of the composite cathode after sintering the fabricated single-cell at 700°C for 2 h. As shown, only the diffraction peaks which are related to CFMo (Figure 2a) and CGDC (Figure 2b) reflections are observed, indicating their chemical compatibility.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the prepared materials were recorded in the 2u range between 5 and 100°using a Panalytical X'Pert Pro diffractometer with a CuKa radiation (l = 1.5405 Å), at 40 kV and 40 mA. The crystallite size (D) and lattice parameters (a = b = c) were estimated using the following equations (Orozco et al, 2017):…”
Section: Materials Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Mo 3d region of the XPS spectrum in Figure d shows the spin–orbit splitting of 3d orbital into Mo 3d 5/2 and Mo 3d 3/2 core-levels, and these two peaks can be further deconvoluted into two peaks. While the prominent components located around 230.9 and 233.8 eV correspond to the Mo 4+ oxidation state, the weaker (lower intensity) components peaked around 231.9 and 235.9 eV are attributed to the Mo 5+ oxidation state. , The results indicate the Mo incorporated in Cu 2 O, remains mainly in Mo 4+ oxidation state with a minor amount of Mo 5+ . Quantitative XPS analysis of the sample estimated ∼3.75 wt % of Mo in the microstructures, which is consistent with the Mo content estimated by EDS analysis.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%