2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Modified Constrain Induced Movement Therapy on Fatigue and Motor Performance in Sub Acute Stroke

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 44 studies [11,12,20–61] with 1779 patients and 13 interventions were included. The fundamental characteristics of the included studies are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 44 studies [11,12,20–61] with 1779 patients and 13 interventions were included. The fundamental characteristics of the included studies are presented in Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fundamental characteristics of the included studies are presented in Table 2. Among the included studies, 24 studies [12,[21][22][23][32][33][34][37][38][39][40][41][42][43]47,49,[54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61] were conducted in Asia, eight studies [24,26,27,31,35,48,52,53] in Europe, seven studies [25,28,29,44,45,50,51] in North America, two studies [36,46] in South America, two studies [11,31] in Africa and one study [20]…”
Section: Characteristics Of the Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifteen articles (60%) showed statistically significant improvement in motor and functional outcomes through use of CIMT/mCIMT and concluded that CIMT is superior to conventional therapy in overcoming non-use of affected upper limb and the resulting impairment in acute or subacute phase post stroke. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] Two articles (8%) showed that CIMT brings about limited improvements functionally but does not reduce significant disability and is not superior to conventional therapy in motor gains. [30,31] Most of the articles (50%) have denied long term gains or improvements lasting more than six months after use of CIMT; with 1 article (4%) specifically denying any effects lasting post six months.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding fatigue, the generation of force tends to decrease with fatigue and tends to impair movement’s motor control [ 27 , 28 ]. The origins of fatigue can be central or peripheral.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%