2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.129506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of modification of UiO-66 for CO2 adsorption and separation of CO2/CH4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The trend in the CO 2 adsorption performance of the as-prepared samples is consistent with the order of BET specific surface areas (Figure S4). The photocatalytic stability of a catalyst can be determined by multiple photocatalytic cycles Figure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trend in the CO 2 adsorption performance of the as-prepared samples is consistent with the order of BET specific surface areas (Figure S4). The photocatalytic stability of a catalyst can be determined by multiple photocatalytic cycles Figure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen from the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of UiO-66 and its derivatives that different kinds of UiO-66 nanoparticles demonstrate similar spherical crystal structures (Figure ). More importantly, all types of UiO-66 nanoparticles have a certain degree of agglomeration, , but the nanoparticle grafted with SPA (UiO-66-SPA) demonstrates less tendency to aggregate with smaller nanoparticles (Figure d). Notably, although SPA chains have been grafted onto the UiO-66 particles, the particle size of UiO-66-SPA is only about one-third of that of UiO-66.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In view of the high density metal exposure sites in the NUC-31 tubular nanochannel, which makes it potentially adsorbed to quadrupole moment target molecules, we tested the CO 2 adsorption performance of NUC-31 at 273 and 298 K. The results show that the maximum adsorption capacity of CO 2 at 273 and 298 K was 95.12 and 67.35 cm 3 ·g –1 (Figure ), respectively, which were higher than those of NUC-5 , MOF-5 , UiO-66 , NUC-30 , and so on recorded in the literature. At the same time, there is a moderate lag loop in the incomplete adsorption–desorption isotherm of CO 2 , indicating that there is a strong interaction between NUC-31 and the host and guest of CO 2 .…”
Section: Studies Of Gas Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…NUC-31 should be activated before porosity testing; first, it was successively immersed in methanol for 3 days and then in dichloromethane for 3 days, during which the solvent was renewed every 12 h. Finally, a vacuum oven was used for the final drying at a temperature of 120 °C for 24 h. The N 2 adsorption experiments at 77 K showed that the total pore volume of activated NUC-31 was 0.59 cm 3 ·g –1 , and the specific surface area calculated by the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method was 1590 m 2 ·g –1 . The adsorption–desorption isotherms of N 2 exhibited a typical type-I adsorption configuration with the pore size distribution ranging from 0.8 to 1.6 nm (Figure S8).…”
Section: Studies Of Gas Adsorptionmentioning
confidence: 99%