2010
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-97332010000200013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Mo interlayer on magnetic properties of exchange coupled Sm-Co/Fe bilayers

Abstract: Sm-Co/Fe, hard/soft magnetic bilayers have been fabricated on 70 nm Cr buffered Si (100) substrate by dc and rf magnetron sputtering and annealed at 525 O C for 30min. Very thin Mo layers (0-0.7 nm) were introduced between Sm-Co and Fe layers. The samples were analyzed by X-Ray Diffraction (XRD) and Alternating Gradient Magnetometer (AGM). All of the samples showed strong exchange coupling between hard and soft magnetic phases. Magnetization, coercivity and energy product (BH) max suggest a sinusoidal behavior… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For four non magnetic spacers, the magnetic coupling disappears, while in Cr and Mn the oscillating behaviour is sustained by the intrinsic magnetic moment as experimentally observed [11,21]. The oscillating behaviour, reported in figure 5, was already observed in other heterostructures with bcc Fe/Co [20,24]. However in our case the oscillation decays more rapidly with the spacer thickness as was shown in similar systems for nonmagnetic spacer [25], probably due to the different properties of Gd.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%
“…For four non magnetic spacers, the magnetic coupling disappears, while in Cr and Mn the oscillating behaviour is sustained by the intrinsic magnetic moment as experimentally observed [11,21]. The oscillating behaviour, reported in figure 5, was already observed in other heterostructures with bcc Fe/Co [20,24]. However in our case the oscillation decays more rapidly with the spacer thickness as was shown in similar systems for nonmagnetic spacer [25], probably due to the different properties of Gd.…”
supporting
confidence: 83%