2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of mixed in crystallization modifiers on the resistance of lime mortar against NaCl and Na2SO4 crystallization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to reflect the real situation in practice, two salts were chosen for the test procedure, namely sodium sulfate (anhydrous) Na 2 SO 4 and sodium chloride NaCl, and moreover, the concentration of both salts was lower than prescribed in the standard EN 12370 [ 39 ], which overestimates salt concentration in the crystallization experiment. According to the recommendations of Lubelli et al [ 40 ] and Granneman et al [ 41 ], the amount of each salt used was chosen to be 2% (weight salt/weight dry specimen). Oven dried specimens having dimensions of 40 mm × 40 mm × 40 mm were subjected to 10 crystallization cycles, each cycle consisted of samples immersion in salt solution for 2 h followed by drying in an oven at 70 °C for at least 16 h. After drying, specimens were removed from the oven and left to cool for 2 h. Each sample was placed in its own container, which was during the immersion and cooling phase covered with the cap to prevent evaporation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reflect the real situation in practice, two salts were chosen for the test procedure, namely sodium sulfate (anhydrous) Na 2 SO 4 and sodium chloride NaCl, and moreover, the concentration of both salts was lower than prescribed in the standard EN 12370 [ 39 ], which overestimates salt concentration in the crystallization experiment. According to the recommendations of Lubelli et al [ 40 ] and Granneman et al [ 41 ], the amount of each salt used was chosen to be 2% (weight salt/weight dry specimen). Oven dried specimens having dimensions of 40 mm × 40 mm × 40 mm were subjected to 10 crystallization cycles, each cycle consisted of samples immersion in salt solution for 2 h followed by drying in an oven at 70 °C for at least 16 h. After drying, specimens were removed from the oven and left to cool for 2 h. Each sample was placed in its own container, which was during the immersion and cooling phase covered with the cap to prevent evaporation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the EN 12370 [57] defines testing of salt crystallization resistance of natural stone, it overestimates salt concentration in the salt crystallization resistance test. With respect to the recommendations reported in [58,59], the concentration of each salt used was chosen to be 2% (weight salt/weight dry specimen). Oven-dried 90-day specimens having dimensions of 40 mm × 40 mm × 40 mm were subjected to 10 crystallization cycles; each cycle consisted of immersion of the samples in salt solution for 2 h followed by drying in an oven at 70 • C for at least 16 h. After drying, specimens were removed from the oven and left to cool for 2 h. Each sample was placed in its own container, which was covered with the cap to prevent evaporation during the immersion and cooling phase.…”
Section: Salt Crystallization Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, addition of FeCN before NaCl ingress can be a solution to prevent salt damage. This has been first tested in hydrated lime-based mortars by adding FeCN directly during the mixing of the mortar [11,12]. This application of inhibitor offers an advantage that the FeCN ions are already distributed in the mortar and can react to salt ingress at an early stage, preventing or effectively reducing salt crystallisation damage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This application of inhibitor offers an advantage that the FeCN ions are already distributed in the mortar and can react to salt ingress at an early stage, preventing or effectively reducing salt crystallisation damage. Granneman et al report that the mortar with the FeCN inhibitor showed an increased resistance with respect to the reference mortar, after an accelerated crystallisation test, while not showing any change in other relevant physical and mechanical properties [12,13]. On the other hand, Natural hydraulic lime-based mortars can offer a good compromise, having both sufficient durability and compatibility with the historic, valuable materials [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%