2013
DOI: 10.1186/1752-153x-7-113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of microwave treatment on the physicochemical properties of potato starch granules

Abstract: BackgroundThe degree of polymerization of amylose starch in potato was so large that the gel was hardness after gelatinization. Therefore, it is one of the most important ways that the microwave treatment was used to change the physicochemical properties of starch gel to make it suitable for the preparation of instant food.ResultsThe effect of microwave treatment on the physicochemical properties including morphology, crystalline structure, molecular weight distribution and rheological properties of potato sta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
67
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
7
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Zhang et al, Rg reflects the molecular size, indicating that JFSS has a relatively large molecular size. The M w values in RS and PS were 0.42 × 10 7 g mol −1 and 4.74 × 10 7 g mol −1 , respectively, similar to the results of Xie et al and Viturawong et al who reported that the M w of RS and PS were 4.05 × 10 6 g mol −1 and 4.59 × 10 7 g mol −1 , respectively . According to Liu et al, the M w , M n , and R g of cereal starches with A‐type crystalline structures were lower than those in starches with B‐type crystalline structures, such as bean starch .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…According to Zhang et al, Rg reflects the molecular size, indicating that JFSS has a relatively large molecular size. The M w values in RS and PS were 0.42 × 10 7 g mol −1 and 4.74 × 10 7 g mol −1 , respectively, similar to the results of Xie et al and Viturawong et al who reported that the M w of RS and PS were 4.05 × 10 6 g mol −1 and 4.59 × 10 7 g mol −1 , respectively . According to Liu et al, the M w , M n , and R g of cereal starches with A‐type crystalline structures were lower than those in starches with B‐type crystalline structures, such as bean starch .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…As shown in the figure, elution volume of graft copolymers shifted to higher values compared to that of alginate, which resulted in a significant decrease in the molecular weights as presented in Table . This result demonstrates that microwave irradiation used in the grafting reaction may cause cleavage of some bonds in the alginate chains . However, when grafting percentages increased from 58% to 88%, all types of average molecular weights increased proportionally, due to the formation of much longer PDEAAm chains in the copolymer structure.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Alternative HMT processing methods include reduced-pressure HMT (RP-HMT) (Maruta et al 1994;Bahrani et al 2012Bahrani et al , 2013, direct-vapor HMT (DV-HMT) (Bahrani et al 2012(Bahrani et al , 2013, and instantaneous controlled pressure drop (DIC, for détente instantanée contrôlée) processing (Maache-Rezzoug et al 2008, 2010Bahrani et al 2012Bahrani et al , 2013) (see Section 3.3.2), all of which involve direct steam injection under varied processing or pressure conditions. Other reported HMT processing adaptations include pre-or postannealing in conjunction with HMT (Stute 1992;Chung et al 2009aChung et al , 2010, dual-stage HMT (Klein et al 2013), use of microwave irradiation for rapid HMT treatment (Lewandowicz et al 1997;Stevenson et al 2005;Anderson & Guraya 2006;Luo et al 2006;Zhang et al 2009Zhang et al , 2010aXie et al 2013) (see Section 2.5), and use of aqueous alcohol as an HMT heating medium (Kurakake et al 1997). HMT may be conducted following pretreatment with an acid (Brumovsky & Thompson 2001, Shin et al 2004, under varied pH conditions (Kim & Huber 2013), or in the presence of high concentrations of a salt-termed osmotic pressure treatment (OPT) ) (see Section 2.6)-or xylitol (Sun et al 2014a).…”
Section: Alternative Hmt Processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%