“…Any internal surface area, such as cracks or pores, created by the volume change of the foils remains unexposed to the SSE, which significantly reduces the extent of SEI formation compared to liquid electrolytes. ,, Generally, lithium alloy materials have good chemical compatibility with SSEs due to their higher alloying potentials than lithium metal, , which also mitigates dendritic growth of lithium due to the lack of lithium deposition . Alloy foil anodes in SSBs have been investigated mainly in their prelithiated forms, or with modified microstructure. ,− Indium and physically alloyed lithium–indium foils are commonly used as anodes in laboratory SSB cells because of their simple fabrication, constant potential during alloying/dealloying, and stable cycling performance. ,− Abundant and cost-effective aluminum foils are particularly attractive beyond indium because of the possibility to attain high specific energy/energy density comparable to that of SSBs with dense silicon anodes . Recent reports on aluminum-based anodes have shown stable cycling in SSBs by forming Al–In multiphase microstructures and LiAl alloys. − Silver and magnesium foils have also been widely employed to form lithium-rich solid solution alloys, which minimizes lithium dendrite growth and contact loss at the SSE/electrode interface. − Despite the growing use of alloy foil anodes in SSBs, the reaction mechanisms and degradation behavior of the range of elemental materials that can alloy with lithium are not well understood compared to within lithium-ion batteries with liquid electrolytes.…”