2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2022.144540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of microstructure on tensile properties of quenched and partitioned martensitic stainless steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(95 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the small fraction of Ti and Nb, and the superior fraction of C, it is known and established that all of them have precipitated in the form of carbides (consuming a low amount of C along), as it was proven in our recent work, where a thorough microstructural characterization of the studied alloys was performed. [11] Similar observations were also reported for a Nbmicroalloyed QP-treated carbon steel by Xia et al [12] The effects of the modifications of alloy 3 are here observed, achieving a higher fraction of retained austenite and showing a general reduction of the grain size, which is related to the controlled prior austenite grain size (from PAG size 38.3 μm in alloy 1, to 20.4 μm in alloy 3) via nanocarbides precipitation, as recently reported in ref. [11].…”
Section: Microstructural Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Given the small fraction of Ti and Nb, and the superior fraction of C, it is known and established that all of them have precipitated in the form of carbides (consuming a low amount of C along), as it was proven in our recent work, where a thorough microstructural characterization of the studied alloys was performed. [11] Similar observations were also reported for a Nbmicroalloyed QP-treated carbon steel by Xia et al [12] The effects of the modifications of alloy 3 are here observed, achieving a higher fraction of retained austenite and showing a general reduction of the grain size, which is related to the controlled prior austenite grain size (from PAG size 38.3 μm in alloy 1, to 20.4 μm in alloy 3) via nanocarbides precipitation, as recently reported in ref. [11].…”
Section: Microstructural Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The partitioning parameters used in this study were determined in previous research to provide the most favorable partitioning for the obtained retained austenite. [ 11 ]…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations