2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2015.06.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of microstructure on fatigue behavior of advanced high strength steels produced by quenching and partitioning and the role of retained austenite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
45
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
7
45
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The surface is located to the left in the figure. The martensite plates are light coloured and 0.5-3 µm wide, this corresponds well with the results by de Diego-Calderón et al [38]. The retained austenite inclusions are visible as relatively round, dark structures with less than 1 µm width.…”
Section: Experimental Set-up Test Specimensupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The surface is located to the left in the figure. The martensite plates are light coloured and 0.5-3 µm wide, this corresponds well with the results by de Diego-Calderón et al [38]. The retained austenite inclusions are visible as relatively round, dark structures with less than 1 µm width.…”
Section: Experimental Set-up Test Specimensupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Next-generation structural steels such as ultrahigh-strength transformation-induced plasticity (TRIP)-aided steels, i.e., "TRIP-aided martensitic (TM) steel" [2][3][4], "quenching and partitioning steel" [5,6] and "nanostructured bainitic steel" [7,8] are expected to be increasingly used for fabricating precision gears because of their high toughness and superior fatigue strength [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. Sugimoto et al [10,11] reported that fine-particle peening (FPP) further increases the rotational bending and torsional fatigue strengths of heat-treated TM steel by imparting a significant hardness and compressive residual stress to the precision-gear surface layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher stability of HT2I steel could be attributed, among other factors, to a more efficient carbon partitioning from bainite to austenite and, therefore, carbon enrichment of RA during the isothermal holding at the BIT stage . Moreover, the larger RA particles of HT3I steel along with the higher M s σ temperature may explain the reduced mechanical stability against transformation compared with HT2I steel, since the stability of RA is controlled not only by the local carbon level but also by the RA grain size . In the investigation, the morphology of RA has been taken into account by examination of the RA‐grain aspect ratio.…”
Section: Mechanical Behavior and Ra Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%