2014
DOI: 10.2514/1.j052470
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Microramps on Separated Swept Shock Wave–Boundary-Layer Interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various shapes (34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39) including standard designs such as microramps (31,32) and micro-vanes (30,33) were introduced in different shock-boundary layer interaction flowfields to examine their ability to reduce the flow separation and alleviate its ill effects. The control performance was found to improve with increase in the size of the MVG (31,40) but so did the wave drag associated with it. Although micro-vanes offer better flow control (33) , their slender shape makes them more susceptible to fracture than microramps which has a relatively robust design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Various shapes (34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39) including standard designs such as microramps (31,32) and micro-vanes (30,33) were introduced in different shock-boundary layer interaction flowfields to examine their ability to reduce the flow separation and alleviate its ill effects. The control performance was found to improve with increase in the size of the MVG (31,40) but so did the wave drag associated with it. Although micro-vanes offer better flow control (33) , their slender shape makes them more susceptible to fracture than microramps which has a relatively robust design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%