Effect of Membrane Materials and Operational Parameters on Performance and Energy Consumption of Oil/Water Emulsion Filtration

Abstract

Membrane technology is one of reliable options for treatment of oil/water emulsion. It is highly attractive because of its effectiveness in separating fine oil droplets of <2 µm sizes, which is highly challenging for other processes. However, the progress for its widespread implementations is still highly restricted by membrane fouling. Most of the earlier studies have demonstrated the promise of achieving more sustained filtration via membrane material developments. This study addresses issues beyond membrane development by assessing the impact of membrane material (blend of polysulfone, PSF and polyethylene glycol, PEG), operational pressure, and crude oil concentration on the filtration performance of oil/water emulsion. The filtration data were then used to project the pumping energy for a full-scale system. Results show that fouling resistant membrane offered high oil/water emulsion permeability, which translated into a low energy consumption. The oil/water emulsion permeability was improved by three-fold from 45 ± 0 to 139 ± 1 L/(m2 h bar) for PSF/PEG-0 membrane in comparison to the most optimum one of PSF/PEG-60. It corresponded to an energy saving of up to ~66%. The pumping energy could further be reduced from 27.0 to 7.6 Wh/m3 by operation under ultra-low pressure from 0.2 to 0.05 bar. Sustainable permeability could be achieved when treating 1000 ppm oil/water emulsion, but severe membrane fouling was observed when treating emulsion containing crude oils of >3000 ppm to a point of no flux.

Enhancing oil–water emulsion separation using improved styrene–acrylonitrile copolymer membrane: Experimental and thermodynamic study of the impact of solvent mixtures

“…Among these interactions, only g 12 depends on the concentration of components and two other parameters, g 13 and g 23 , are considered independent. 25 α and β mean the two polymer-poor and polymer-rich phases, and the u 2 parameter was obtained from Equation (12). 21…”

Effect of Flowrate and Pressure on the Crossflow Filtration in Textile Wastewater Treatment by Commercial UF Membrane

“…The application of membrane technology extends to diverse industries, including pharmaceuticals, medicine, biotechnology, food processing, chemicals, as well as industrial effluent and wastewater treatment. Its widespread adoption is attributed to several advantages, including ease of operation, high contaminant removal capacity, cost-effective materials, and wide availability [9]. Moreover, compared to conventional separation methods, membrane technology offers the benefits of reduced energy requirements and compact equipment, further enhancing its appeal [10].…”

Carbon Emission Calculations and Reductions in Membrane Water Treatment: A Review

“…Among them, membrane technology operation is a carbon emission process, while resource recovery through membrane technology is a carbon offset process. In the wastewater treatment process, optimization of operating conditions, pretreatment and flushing, use of membrane combination process, and coupling with clean energy can reduce the GHG emissions of membrane technology. − Resource recovery is an important pathway to reduce GHG emissions, which mainly includes reuse of resources (biomass energy methane, nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus, and reclaimed water) in wastewater and reuse of membranes . First, resource recovery from the water treatment process reduces the secondary pollution of the environment, especially methane recovery, which reduces greenhouse gas emissions and enables the secondary use of fuel. , The residual sludge that will be processed through the process can be used as fertilizer, which avoids GHG emissions from the sludge disposal process and also achieves the reuse of nutrients .…”