2011
DOI: 10.1016/s1003-6326(11)61118-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of mechanical activation on thiosulfate leaching of gold from complex sulfide concentrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Analysis of scientific-technical and patent literature shows that the research is directed to problem-solving connected with certain types of materials and special reactant treatments of technological processes. It is obvious that during study of extraction technology of nonferrous metals (Ahmed et al, 2012;Vafaeian et al, 2011), noble metals (Celep et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2004) in leach (Alonso-Gómez and Lapidus, 2009) and electrolytic processes (Kenzhaliev, 2014;Silva et al, 1994) from sulfide, oxidized, mixed mineral products and concentrates (Feng and Van Deventer, 2006;Hashemzadehfini et al, 2011;Senanayake, 2007), recovered and technogenic materials (Jessop and Turner, 2011), mineralogical particularity of mining aspects is neglected, as a rule, especially in regard to same-name materials, which can vary in their chemical activity in reference to chemical agents and can show physical properties leading to their incomplete usage in technological process. Insufficient attention is paid to interconnection, interdependence in multicomponent systems both in solid state during thin interpenetration of different minerals and during leach, sorption and electrolytic processes (Jeffrey et al, 2005).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of scientific-technical and patent literature shows that the research is directed to problem-solving connected with certain types of materials and special reactant treatments of technological processes. It is obvious that during study of extraction technology of nonferrous metals (Ahmed et al, 2012;Vafaeian et al, 2011), noble metals (Celep et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2004) in leach (Alonso-Gómez and Lapidus, 2009) and electrolytic processes (Kenzhaliev, 2014;Silva et al, 1994) from sulfide, oxidized, mixed mineral products and concentrates (Feng and Van Deventer, 2006;Hashemzadehfini et al, 2011;Senanayake, 2007), recovered and technogenic materials (Jessop and Turner, 2011), mineralogical particularity of mining aspects is neglected, as a rule, especially in regard to same-name materials, which can vary in their chemical activity in reference to chemical agents and can show physical properties leading to their incomplete usage in technological process. Insufficient attention is paid to interconnection, interdependence in multicomponent systems both in solid state during thin interpenetration of different minerals and during leach, sorption and electrolytic processes (Jeffrey et al, 2005).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For gold encapsulated in arsenopyrite or pyrite, pretreatments are necessary in order to break or alter the matrix of the sulfide (Chryssoulis and McMullen, 2005;Climo et al, 2000;Hashemzadehfini et al, 2011). The most common techniques include pre-aeration, roasting, high pressure oxidation and biological oxidation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the performance of reagents is highly limited, despite the use of various reagents at different conditions (i.e., acidic and/or basic) [17][18][19]. Pre-treatments are required to improve gold recovery at economically viable levels [20,21]. Moreover, the beneficiation techniques such as gravity separation, flotation, roasting, high pressure oxidation, and biological oxidation are the most common techniques used in the gold industry to extract refractory gold [15,[22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%