2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of maturational timing on bone health in male adolescent athletes engaged in different sports: The PRO-BONE study

Abstract: ISRCTN17982776.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Height (cm) and body mass (kg) were measured by using standard procedures [ 27 ]. Somatic maturity status was assessed as years from peak height velocity using age and height in a validated algorithm ( R 2 = 0.90; standard error = 0.5) [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Height (cm) and body mass (kg) were measured by using standard procedures [ 27 ]. Somatic maturity status was assessed as years from peak height velocity using age and height in a validated algorithm ( R 2 = 0.90; standard error = 0.5) [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Football is generally recognized as an osteogenic sport, associated with positive effects on bone mass and strength of the weight-bearing bones. 41 However, current research on osteogenic effects in youth sports has not yet quantified the correct combination of specific characteristics such as intensity, frequency, duration, non-repetitive movements, and rest toward optimal bone adaptation. 42 Lastly, the prevalence of spondylolysis was 4%, near to the 6% reported elsewhere.…”
Section: Physeal Fracturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research showed reduced bone turnover in AGHD patients [26]. Our AGHD patients were not diagnosed in childhood, which may predispose patients to more pronounced bone loss due to the longer duration of the disease [27][28][29] and therefore compromise peak bone mass acquisition [30,31]; however, they had a significantly lower aBMD compared to both control and acromegaly groups. The differences in the aBMD between AGHD patients and controls were only evident for the total hip, not for the femoral neck or trochanter sites.…”
Section: Differences In Abmd Among Groupsmentioning
confidence: 89%