2015
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of maternal and treatment‐related factors on the prevalence of birth defects after PESAICSI and TESEICSI: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract: We found a similar overall prevalence of birth defects in newborns born after PESA-ICSI and TESE-ICSI. The maternal and treatment-related factors investigated did not show a significantly increased cumulative risk of birth defects.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(49 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies showed that children born following ART application have increased epigenetic anomalies compared with those conceived spontaneously [3][4][5][6][7]. Children who were born by using ART techniques seem to have more possibility of birth defects [8], congenital or chromosomal anomalies [9], and imprinting disorders such as Beckwith-Wiedemann, Silver Russell, Angelman, and Prader-Willi syndromes compared with spontaneously conceived babies [6,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies showed that children born following ART application have increased epigenetic anomalies compared with those conceived spontaneously [3][4][5][6][7]. Children who were born by using ART techniques seem to have more possibility of birth defects [8], congenital or chromosomal anomalies [9], and imprinting disorders such as Beckwith-Wiedemann, Silver Russell, Angelman, and Prader-Willi syndromes compared with spontaneously conceived babies [6,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICSI is based on either ejaculated sperm or surgically acquired sperm; the surgical methods for acquiring sperm include percutaneous epididymal sperm aspiration (PESA), testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) and microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE). The reported clinical outcomes based on the different methods of obtaining sperm are not uniform, and few studies have analyzed neonatal outcomes associated with the different sperm acquisition methods ( 5 7 ). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore the effects of different sperm sources for ICSI on the live birth rate (LBR) and neonatal outcomes to provide evidence for clinical consultation and treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%