1969
DOI: 10.1093/aesa/62.4.828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Male Accessory Material on Oviposition and Mating by Female House Flies1

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One possible SAC-related function of the movements of the pneumopophyses, suggested by observations of other insects, is that they (at least those with teeth) rub holes in the lining of the female's vagina (Merritt 1989;Crudgington and Siva-Jothy 2000;Flowers and Eberhard 2006). This could allow male seminal products to escape into her body cavity (Gillot and Langley 1981) where they could induce female responses such as sperm transport and resistance to further copulations (Riemann and Thorson 1969;Chen 1984). Previous studies of the reproductive physiology of G. morsitans argue strongly against this alternative, however; introduction of male seminal products into the female's body cavity did not affect ovulation, insemination or remating (Saunders and Dodd 1972;Gillot and Langley 1981).…”
Section: Sexually Antagonistic Coevolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible SAC-related function of the movements of the pneumopophyses, suggested by observations of other insects, is that they (at least those with teeth) rub holes in the lining of the female's vagina (Merritt 1989;Crudgington and Siva-Jothy 2000;Flowers and Eberhard 2006). This could allow male seminal products to escape into her body cavity (Gillot and Langley 1981) where they could induce female responses such as sperm transport and resistance to further copulations (Riemann and Thorson 1969;Chen 1984). Previous studies of the reproductive physiology of G. morsitans argue strongly against this alternative, however; introduction of male seminal products into the female's body cavity did not affect ovulation, insemination or remating (Saunders and Dodd 1972;Gillot and Langley 1981).…”
Section: Sexually Antagonistic Coevolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andres and Arnqvist (2001) interrupted initial pairs after 30 minutes. Transfer of seminal fluids is complete after 40 minutes (Leopold et al 1971) and the effects of this fluid on female physiology is dose dependent (Riemann and Thorson 1969). Given that allopatry promotes reproductive divergence, the populations may have diverged in the order, timing of transfer, and/or the dosage of components and thus the effects of these chemicals on female physiology may be different.…”
Section: Misconceptions and Mismeasures Of Sexually Antagonistic Coevmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After mating, female insects can become temporarily unattractive, they can show reduced receptivity to mating, and they can increase their rate of egg production (e.g., refs. [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. In Drosophila melanogaster females, post-mating responses are elicited by pheromones, sperm, and male ejaculate proteins (reviewed in refs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%