2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2005.08.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of magnesium promoter on iron-based catalyst for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
42
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Luckily, the CO conversion, the methane and CO 2 selectivity were stable during the entire experimental period. Similar results were reported in the previous studies in Fe-based catalysts [24][25][26]. They found that time on stream had an important influence on composition and structure of catalyst, and concluded that the FTS activity of iron catalyst was generated with time, when the a-Fe reacted with carbon from CO dissociation, forming the iron carbide, which was addressed as the true active species for FTS.…”
Section: Reaction Performancesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Luckily, the CO conversion, the methane and CO 2 selectivity were stable during the entire experimental period. Similar results were reported in the previous studies in Fe-based catalysts [24][25][26]. They found that time on stream had an important influence on composition and structure of catalyst, and concluded that the FTS activity of iron catalyst was generated with time, when the a-Fe reacted with carbon from CO dissociation, forming the iron carbide, which was addressed as the true active species for FTS.…”
Section: Reaction Performancesupporting
confidence: 87%
“…A systematic study on the modifying effect of Mg on a precipitated Fe-Cu-K/SiO 2 catalyst showed that there was an optimum content of Mg for obtaining better catalytic performances. [76] At an optimized Mg/Fe weight ratio (0.07), the activity of WGS reaction could be suppressed, whereas the FT activity was enhanced. Mg modification could also effectively shift the product distribution to lighter hydrocarbons, especially to gasoline-range hydrocarbons (C 5 -C 11 ), and could suppress the hydrogenation of light olefins, resulting in higher selectivity to C 2 -C 4 olefins.…”
Section: Co ! Co þC ð6þmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These smaller particles can be regarded as active sites for FTS, which shorten the structure evolution paths of Fe 2 O 3 . It was also observed that the Mg-promoted Fe/Cu/K/SiO 2 catalyst could enhance the catalytic activity and + 5 C selectivity; the highest Fe 5 C 2 percentage of the iron phase in this outstanding catalyst after activation was observed in the Mössbauer emission spectroscopy (MES) [66]. The FTS activity was also decreased with a decrease in the Fe 5 C 2 concentration, which was caused by the addition of silica [170].…”
Section: Xrdmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Its addition to the core metal of iron decreased the crystallite size of iron oxides, led to more heavy hydrocarbons, and suppressed the formation of CH 4 [65]. Similarly, auxiliary metal like Mg also led to the small crystallite size of iron oxide and facilitated the reduction and carburization process [66]. In contrast to Mn and Mg, potassium addition to Fe-Mn catalyst resulted in larger crystallite size and lower surface area of the Fe catalysts and inhibited the reduction and carburization of iron [64].…”
Section: Promotional Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%