“…In comparison, the volume stability of CAC‐bonded castables with a value of 0.25 was higher because of the shrinkage associated with sintering of fine patricles 34 . However, it could not straightforward analogize the conclusion from CAC‐bonded to RM‐bonded castables because of the differences in volume expansion of in situ products 29 . CaO·2Al 2 O 3 (CA 2 ) and CaO·6Al 2 O 3 (CA 6 ) accompanied with 13.6% and 3.0% volume expansion, respectively, are generated in CAC‐bonded castbales, 14,35 whereas MgAl 2 O 4 (MA) with 8.4% volume expansion formed in RM‐bonded castables 1,33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The flow‐ability and explosion resistance during drying of RM‐bonded castables were also experimentally studied by Pandolfelli and co‐workers 6,13,30 . Zhao et al 29 . reported that RM‐bonded castables possessed better volume stability and corrosion and infiltration resistance to CaO‐Al 2 O 3 ‐Fe 2 O 3 ‐SiO 2 (CAFS)‐based slag than CAC‐bonded one, because of the absence of CaO·6Al 2 O 3 (CA 6 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because (1) the slag corrosion and infiltration resistance of castables could be improved due to the in‐situ formed MgAl 2 O 4 spinel, 5 (2) and low energy consumption and CO 2 emission during RM preparation 31,32 . To evaluate the feasibility of RM‐bonded castables in industrial application, numerous researches have been carried out 6,13,27,29,30 . By modifying the hydration behavior of MgO using formic acid and or aluminum lactate, 25 crack‐free RM‐bonded castables were prepared 27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…found that Cr(VI) formation can be effectively suppressed in RM‐bonded Cr 2 O 3 ‐bearing castables compared with calcium aluminate cement (CAC)‐bonded samples. In these work, RM‐bonded castables with a q ‐value of 0.26 were prepared and studied 6,13,27,29,30,33 . Zou et al., 34 however, have figured out that properties of CAC‐bonded castables could be affected by the particle gradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CaO·2Al 2 O 3 (CA 2 ) and CaO·6Al 2 O 3 (CA 6 ) accompanied with 13.6% and 3.0% volume expansion, respectively, are generated in CAC‐bonded castbales, 14,35 whereas MgAl 2 O 4 (MA) with 8.4% volume expansion formed in RM‐bonded castables 1,33 . These differences would consequently result in varied thermal‐mechanical properties of CAC‐ and RM‐bonded castables 29 . However, to authors’ knowledge, no experiment has been performed to address the effect of particle gradation on properties of RM‐bonded castables.…”
Refractory matrix is a key factor in determining the properties and performance, and thus the lifetime of refractory materials. The particle gradation affected both the matrix composition and microstructure. In this study, six particle gradations of high‐alumina castables were prepared based on Andreasen's model (q = 0.22, 0.24, 0.26, 0.28, 0.30 and 0.32). The influence of particle gradation on properties of high‐alumina castables bonded with 4.0 wt% reactive MgO (RM) was investigated with respect to the difference in matrix composition and microstructure. The results show that castables with q values of 0.24 and 0.26 exhibited better physical and mechanical properties after curing and drying. The castables with a q value of 0.22 showed the best volume stability after firing at 1600°C, whereas, castables with a q value of 0.24 exhibited the highest mechanical strength, and residual CMOR ratio after thermal shock testing. Based on the property analyses of castables, the optimal q value of RM‐bonded castables would be around 0.24.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
“…In comparison, the volume stability of CAC‐bonded castables with a value of 0.25 was higher because of the shrinkage associated with sintering of fine patricles 34 . However, it could not straightforward analogize the conclusion from CAC‐bonded to RM‐bonded castables because of the differences in volume expansion of in situ products 29 . CaO·2Al 2 O 3 (CA 2 ) and CaO·6Al 2 O 3 (CA 6 ) accompanied with 13.6% and 3.0% volume expansion, respectively, are generated in CAC‐bonded castbales, 14,35 whereas MgAl 2 O 4 (MA) with 8.4% volume expansion formed in RM‐bonded castables 1,33 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The flow‐ability and explosion resistance during drying of RM‐bonded castables were also experimentally studied by Pandolfelli and co‐workers 6,13,30 . Zhao et al 29 . reported that RM‐bonded castables possessed better volume stability and corrosion and infiltration resistance to CaO‐Al 2 O 3 ‐Fe 2 O 3 ‐SiO 2 (CAFS)‐based slag than CAC‐bonded one, because of the absence of CaO·6Al 2 O 3 (CA 6 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because (1) the slag corrosion and infiltration resistance of castables could be improved due to the in‐situ formed MgAl 2 O 4 spinel, 5 (2) and low energy consumption and CO 2 emission during RM preparation 31,32 . To evaluate the feasibility of RM‐bonded castables in industrial application, numerous researches have been carried out 6,13,27,29,30 . By modifying the hydration behavior of MgO using formic acid and or aluminum lactate, 25 crack‐free RM‐bonded castables were prepared 27 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…found that Cr(VI) formation can be effectively suppressed in RM‐bonded Cr 2 O 3 ‐bearing castables compared with calcium aluminate cement (CAC)‐bonded samples. In these work, RM‐bonded castables with a q ‐value of 0.26 were prepared and studied 6,13,27,29,30,33 . Zou et al., 34 however, have figured out that properties of CAC‐bonded castables could be affected by the particle gradation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CaO·2Al 2 O 3 (CA 2 ) and CaO·6Al 2 O 3 (CA 6 ) accompanied with 13.6% and 3.0% volume expansion, respectively, are generated in CAC‐bonded castbales, 14,35 whereas MgAl 2 O 4 (MA) with 8.4% volume expansion formed in RM‐bonded castables 1,33 . These differences would consequently result in varied thermal‐mechanical properties of CAC‐ and RM‐bonded castables 29 . However, to authors’ knowledge, no experiment has been performed to address the effect of particle gradation on properties of RM‐bonded castables.…”
Refractory matrix is a key factor in determining the properties and performance, and thus the lifetime of refractory materials. The particle gradation affected both the matrix composition and microstructure. In this study, six particle gradations of high‐alumina castables were prepared based on Andreasen's model (q = 0.22, 0.24, 0.26, 0.28, 0.30 and 0.32). The influence of particle gradation on properties of high‐alumina castables bonded with 4.0 wt% reactive MgO (RM) was investigated with respect to the difference in matrix composition and microstructure. The results show that castables with q values of 0.24 and 0.26 exhibited better physical and mechanical properties after curing and drying. The castables with a q value of 0.22 showed the best volume stability after firing at 1600°C, whereas, castables with a q value of 0.24 exhibited the highest mechanical strength, and residual CMOR ratio after thermal shock testing. Based on the property analyses of castables, the optimal q value of RM‐bonded castables would be around 0.24.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.