2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.06.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of MA-g-PP compatibilizer on morphology and electrical properties of MWCNT based blend nanocomposites: New strategy to enhance the dispersion of MWCNTs in immiscible poly (trimethylene terephthalate)/polypropylene blends

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Poothanari et al 2 studied the EMI shielding effectiveness of polycarbonate/polypropylene (PC/PP)/MWCNT blend nanocomposites and they obtained an EMI shielding value of 54.78 dB for 2 mm thick shield sample at 10 wt% of MWCNT for compatibilized PC/PP/MWCNT nanocomposite. PTT/PP/MWCNT system was studied previously by our group and obtained excellent results 3,4 . Sharika et al fabricated PP/NR/MWCNT blend nanocomposites and measured shielding effectiveness of ~29 dB at 3 GHz for 7 wt% of MWCNT loading 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poothanari et al 2 studied the EMI shielding effectiveness of polycarbonate/polypropylene (PC/PP)/MWCNT blend nanocomposites and they obtained an EMI shielding value of 54.78 dB for 2 mm thick shield sample at 10 wt% of MWCNT for compatibilized PC/PP/MWCNT nanocomposite. PTT/PP/MWCNT system was studied previously by our group and obtained excellent results 3,4 . Sharika et al fabricated PP/NR/MWCNT blend nanocomposites and measured shielding effectiveness of ~29 dB at 3 GHz for 7 wt% of MWCNT loading 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32,35] In light of this, it becomes necessary to add compatibilizers, aiming at reducing the interfacial tension and improving the adhesion between the phases present in the mixture, in order to obtain a material with higher quality. [36] In general, rubbery compatibilizers have been explored in blends with PP, such as ethylene-propylene-diene (EPDM) and styrene-ethylene-butylene-styrene (SEBS). [37][38][39][40] These have the advantages of resistance to heat, oxygen, and ozone, since they do not have unsaturations in the main chain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques include the use of compatibilizers such as graft copolymers, which act as a bridge between the matrix and the biofiller, thus enhancing their interaction. [ 18,19 ] Polyethylene grafted with maleic anhydride (PE ‐g‐ MA) is one of the most widely used compatibilizers in WPC with polyethylene matrices due to its dual functionality that can interact with both the polyethylene matrix (polyethylene segment chains in PE ‐g‐ MA), and the lignocellulosic filler (by the interaction of maleic anhydride with hydroxyl groups in lignocellulosic filler). Garcia‐Garcia, [ 20 ] studied the effect of different types of maleic anhydride‐based compatibilizers, namely polyethylene‐ graft ‐maleic anhydride (PE ‐g‐ MA), polypropylene‐ graft ‐maleic anhydride (PP ‐g‐ MA), and polystyrene‐block‐poly(ethylene ‐ran‐ butylene) ‐block‐ polystyrene‐ graft ‐maleic anhydride (SEBS ‐g‐ MA), on the compatibility of biobased polyethylene composites reinforced with peanut shell flour.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%