2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.01.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of low temperature tempering prior cryogenic treatment on carburized steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(5 reference statements)
2
54
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figs. 1(e) and 1(f), the deep cryogenic treatment of the CHTWOT probably gives rise to the most homogenized carbide distribution and the smallest carbide size in the microstructure among the AISI D3 samples used in this study [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]20]. Figure 2 illustrates the XRD patterns of the AISI D3 samples with different treatments.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As shown in Figs. 1(e) and 1(f), the deep cryogenic treatment of the CHTWOT probably gives rise to the most homogenized carbide distribution and the smallest carbide size in the microstructure among the AISI D3 samples used in this study [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]20]. Figure 2 illustrates the XRD patterns of the AISI D3 samples with different treatments.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DCTWOT has a hardness of about 1,059 Hv which corresponds to chromium carbide hardness along with untempered martensite. The DCTWOT has the highest hardness among the AISI D3 samples used due to its most retained austenite elimination, most homogenized carbide distribution and most reduction in carbide size [1,3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]20]. Figure 4 presents the friction coefficients of the AISI D3 samples with different treatments tested against the alumina and 100Cr6 steel balls for about 25,000 laps at a sliding speed of 3 cm/s under a normal load of 1 N. The friction coefficients of the RAW, CHTWOT and DCTWOT tested against the alumina and steel balls are about 0.83 and 0.86, about 0.81 and 0.82 and about 0.67 and 0.76, respectively, which indicates that the CHTWOT has the lower friction than the RAW as the DCTWOT has the further lower friction.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the past studies, the rate of cooling down to sub-zero level may significantly affect the material properties [15,29], where some damage in the form of thermal shock cracks may occur if the rate of cooling is not sluggish enough or due to sudden temperature variations [30,31]. In the present work, the rate of cooling is in the order of 1.5 K min −1 and is slow enough to be helpful to avoid any microcracking [15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…İzotermal dönüşüm süresi ve sonrasındaki soğutma şartlarına göre özellikle kalıntı östenit miktarının değiştiği bilinmektedir [15]. Yeterli soğuma engellenebilmektedir [16]. Özellikle h1 kodlu numunenin sürtünme katsayısının artan yüklemelerdeki düşüşünün mikroyapı içerisinde bulunan kalıntı östenitin gerilme etkisi ile martenzite dönüşümü sayesinde oluştuğu düşünülmektedir.…”
Section: Deneysel çAlışmaunclassified