2002
DOI: 10.1021/ma011689a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Low Surface Energy Chain Ends on the Glass Transition Temperature of Polymer Thin Films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
49
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…12 Also, T g s for a,x-PS(R f ) 2 was lower than that for PS. 24 As a result, the difference between the T adh value of Figure 8. Time evolution of G L for a,x-PS(R f ) 2 layers at 365 K. The data for the corresponding PS systems are also shown.…”
Section: -22mentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…12 Also, T g s for a,x-PS(R f ) 2 was lower than that for PS. 24 As a result, the difference between the T adh value of Figure 8. Time evolution of G L for a,x-PS(R f ) 2 layers at 365 K. The data for the corresponding PS systems are also shown.…”
Section: -22mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our strategy for improving the interfacial adhesion for PS layers is similar, but the extra component is added to the chain ends. We have previously studied the effect of chain ends on surface mobility in PS films 23,24 and found that the surface mobility is much enhanced for PS with hydrophobic end groups 24 because the ends are preferentially segregated to the surface. 12 On the basis of this notion, we tried to improve the interfacial adhesion.…”
Section: -22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample names, component structures, uses, and bulk compositions are listed in Table 1, where the compositions are listed in terms of mass fractions of the P104 component (χ P104 ). Each concentration of polymer thin films was fabricated by spin-casting (model EC 101 spin-coater, Headway Research Inc., Garland, TX) the corresponding solution onto three to six glass coverslips at 1500 rpm for 60 s. The spin-cast samples were immediately vacuum-dried in a vacuum oven (model 5830 vacuum oven, National Appliance Co., Portland, OR) at room temperature under reduced pressure (107 Pa or 0.8 Torr) for at least 24 h. The spin-cast procedure was conducted according to the guidelines of Frank et al 11 and Xie et al 12 The blend film thicknesses were 600–900 nm: some were measured by a profilometer (alpha-step 200, Tencor Instruments, Milpitas, CA) employing a 9.81 × 10 −5 N (10 mg) stylus force; the others were estimated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. The pure P104 films were the thinnest (≈500 nm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These solutions were spin cast at 3000 rpm for 30 s onto the aluminum substrate. The spin-cast procedure was carried out under the guidelines of Frank et al and Xie et al13, 14 The films were then dried further in a vacuum oven (National Appliance Company Model 5830 vacuum oven, Portland, OR at room temperature under reduced pressure (107 Pa) for 72 hrs. Samples used for depth profiling were prepared as described except cast onto a silicon substrate.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%