1980
DOI: 10.1159/000117751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Long-Term Neuroleptic Treatment on Prolactin and Norepinephrine Levels in Serum of Chronic Schizophrenics: Relations to Psychopathology and Extrapyramidal Symptoms

Abstract: The estimation of serum prolactin (Prl) and norepinephrine (NE) in chronic schizophrenics treated with neuroleptics for 5–25 years showed no elevated Prl levels in either men or women (4.9 ± 4.1 and 13.7 ± 12.1 ng/ml, respectively). No significant correlation to duration or dosage of neuroleptic treatment, psychopathological syndromes and occurrence of tardive dyskinesia or parkinsonian side effects could be seen. The development of tolerance of the tuberoinfundibular dopamine system is discussed. The NE level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
1

Year Published

1982
1982
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Continuous antagonistic exposure of risperidone on the D 2 receptors, which would be the case with minipump administration compared with injections, may desensitize the prolactin response. Indeed, several studies indicate that tolerance to antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia may develop during chronic administration in human studies [60,61,62]. Finally, another explanation may be the diurnal variation of prolactin secretion compared with sample collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuous antagonistic exposure of risperidone on the D 2 receptors, which would be the case with minipump administration compared with injections, may desensitize the prolactin response. Indeed, several studies indicate that tolerance to antipsychotic-induced hyperprolactinemia may develop during chronic administration in human studies [60,61,62]. Finally, another explanation may be the diurnal variation of prolactin secretion compared with sample collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both the low baseline PRL-levels found in a few cases and the further tendency to an increase of PRL induced by reserpine in spite of continuous high dose neuroleptic treatment indicates tolerance to the DA blocking effect of neuroleptics in the tuberoinfundibular system (Naber et al, 1980). This hypothesis is also supported by the fact that 3 out of the 4 patients whose PRLlevels did not increase after 14 days of adjuvant reserpine treatment had the highest pre-reserpine PRL levels, presumably because of the lack of tolerance in these cases (see Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…20], How ever, in the great majority (i.e., in 18 out of 25) of our schizophrenic patients who had been treated with neuro leptics for 6 weeks, basal PRL values exceeded the nor mal range; this may easily explain the significantly higher basal PRL values at 14.00 and 24.00 h which were found in our neuroleptic-treated patients, in comparison to their pretreatment values. A well-known effect of neu roleptics is the elevation of the serum PRL level; by blocking dopamine receptors of the tuberoinfundibular system, these drugs prevent the dopamine-mediated in hibition of PRL secretion [21][22][23]. However, within 3-24 years of neuroleptic therapy many patients may de velop a tolerance to the PRL-incrcasing effect of neuro leptics in the tuberoinfundibular system which is revers ible [21][22][23],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A well-known effect of neu roleptics is the elevation of the serum PRL level; by blocking dopamine receptors of the tuberoinfundibular system, these drugs prevent the dopamine-mediated in hibition of PRL secretion [21][22][23]. However, within 3-24 years of neuroleptic therapy many patients may de velop a tolerance to the PRL-incrcasing effect of neuro leptics in the tuberoinfundibular system which is revers ible [21][22][23],…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%