2022
DOI: 10.1007/s43452-022-00534-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of loading characteristics and specimen size in split Hopkinson pressure bar test on high-rate behavior of phyllite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Luo et al [24] studied four types of reef limestone and obtained the correlations of physical properties of reef limestone and its dynamic and static parameters. Mishra et al [25] found that the dimensions of phyllite and the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) loading characteristics had impact on the phyllite response. Han et al [26] found that inclusions embedded in rock materials affected their mechanical response and fracture behavior.…”
Section: Literature Review and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Luo et al [24] studied four types of reef limestone and obtained the correlations of physical properties of reef limestone and its dynamic and static parameters. Mishra et al [25] found that the dimensions of phyllite and the split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) loading characteristics had impact on the phyllite response. Han et al [26] found that inclusions embedded in rock materials affected their mechanical response and fracture behavior.…”
Section: Literature Review and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each component is constructed from 40Cr alloy steel. During the loading phase, a spindle-shaped striker head generated semi-sinusoidal waves, ensuring a consistent strain rate until the rock sample failed [32]. A high-speed camera was mounted in the SPHB frame to capture the fracturing process.…”
Section: Experiments Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain the mechanical parameters required for the numerical model, this paper carried out both static and dynamic mechanical tests. The numerical model parameters were calibrated through static tests, which were then used to validate the results of the dynamic tests 42 , 43 . Since the SHPB test has a symmetrical structure in the up-down and left–right directions, a quarter-symmetry model was chosen for numerical simulation using LS-DYNA to save computation time and disk space.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%