2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfin.2022.102480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of lithium to zirconium ratio on microstructure and electrochemical performances of LZO modified LiNi0.8Co0.1Mn0.1O2 cathode materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include enhancing the ionic conductivity of the cathode material, fostering electron transfer, promoting lithium-ion diffusion dynamics, stabilizing the surface structure, and preventing direct contact between the cathode material and electrolyte. In the interim, inert compounds like oxides, fluorides, phosphates, as well as conductive materials, , such as carbon-based materials and lithium-containing compounds, are primarily used in coating strategies. The elemental doping of the bulk structure, in contrast, is modified at the atomic level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include enhancing the ionic conductivity of the cathode material, fostering electron transfer, promoting lithium-ion diffusion dynamics, stabilizing the surface structure, and preventing direct contact between the cathode material and electrolyte. In the interim, inert compounds like oxides, fluorides, phosphates, as well as conductive materials, , such as carbon-based materials and lithium-containing compounds, are primarily used in coating strategies. The elemental doping of the bulk structure, in contrast, is modified at the atomic level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although peak strengths become weaker after coating in the first cycle, both samples appear to have similar three redox couples, which can be assigned to the phase transformation of the initial hexagonal to the monoclinic phase (H1 to M), the monoclinic to the second hexagonal phase (M to H2), and the second hexagonal to the third hexagonal phase (H2 to H3) during the charging/discharging process, indicating that TPA modification does not significantly influence the electrochemical behavior of the NCM811. 20 According to the viewpoints of Wu et al 20 and Lu et al, 21 the counter cathodic peak is located at 3.67 V, and the first anodic peak corresponds to the oxidation of Ni 2+ to Ni 3+ and/or Ni 4+ . Moreover, the 1TPA@NCM811 demonstrates a lower potential difference (ΔV) of 0.23 V than that of the bare NCM811 (0.38 V), indicating decreased electrochemical polarization and ion transport resistances.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several compounds have been investigated for coating materials, which lead to notable improvements in electrochemical performances. Metal oxides, such as Al 2 O 3 , SiO 2 , ZrO, and TiO 2 , serve as physical barriers to obstruct the contact between the cathode and electrolyte. Fluorides, such as LiF, AlF 3 , and PrF 3 , are incorporated to suppress the degradation of Li salts on the cathode surface. Li-containing oxides, such as Li 2 ZrO 3 , LiTiO 4 , and Li 2 SiO 4 , provide a fast Li + transport channel through the coating layer. Polymer materials with ionic/electronic conductivity polymers reduce the interfacial resistance. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%