2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6dt01169a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ligand denticity on the nitric oxide reactivity of cobalt(ii) complexes

Abstract: The activation of nitric oxide (NO) by transition metal complexes has attracted a wide range of research activity. To study the role of ligand denticity on the NO reactivity of Co(ii) complexes, three complexes (, and ) were prepared with ligands , and [ = N(1),N(2)-bis(2,4,6-trimethylbenzyl)ethane-1,2-diamine; = N(1)-(2,4,6-trimethylbenzyl)-N(2)-(2-((2,4,6-trimethylbenzyl)amino)ethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine] and = N(1)-(2,4,6-trimethylbenzyl)-N(2),N(2)-bis(2-((2,4,6-trimethylbenzyl)amino)ethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine],… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we thus restrict ourselves to well-solved structures, about 20 {CoNO} 8 cases have been published with a clear focus on bent CoNO bonding with an overall pentacoordination of the cobalt center. For various donor sets of the coligands (N 4 , N 3 P, HNP 2 , N 3 Cl, N 2 S 2 , and O 4 ), the Co–N–O angle was found in the range of 118–129°. Two hexacoordinate structures with trans -chlorido ligands were reported with the same degree of CoNO bending (122 and 124°). , Outside this region, we find pentacoordinate centers with a carbon atom in the donor set (CClP 2 , 140°; CHP 2 , 164°) and a linear CoNO function (177°) in a tetracoordinate species with a CP 2 donor set. , When the quality criteria mentioned below are applied, a disappointing result is obtained in that no unambiguously solved crystal structure of a pentacoordinate CoNO center of the linear subclass is available to date, including early reports such as the structure analyses on [Co­(das) 2 (NO)]­(ClO 4 ) 2 [das = 1,2-bis­(dimethylarsino)­benzene], which shows an unreliable ellipsoid of the N NO atom stretched along the CoNO axis and [CoI 2 (NO)­(PMe 3 ) 2 ] with a large O NO ellipsoid through a crystallographic mirror plane and an unreliably short N–O distance. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…If we thus restrict ourselves to well-solved structures, about 20 {CoNO} 8 cases have been published with a clear focus on bent CoNO bonding with an overall pentacoordination of the cobalt center. For various donor sets of the coligands (N 4 , N 3 P, HNP 2 , N 3 Cl, N 2 S 2 , and O 4 ), the Co–N–O angle was found in the range of 118–129°. Two hexacoordinate structures with trans -chlorido ligands were reported with the same degree of CoNO bending (122 and 124°). , Outside this region, we find pentacoordinate centers with a carbon atom in the donor set (CClP 2 , 140°; CHP 2 , 164°) and a linear CoNO function (177°) in a tetracoordinate species with a CP 2 donor set. , When the quality criteria mentioned below are applied, a disappointing result is obtained in that no unambiguously solved crystal structure of a pentacoordinate CoNO center of the linear subclass is available to date, including early reports such as the structure analyses on [Co­(das) 2 (NO)]­(ClO 4 ) 2 [das = 1,2-bis­(dimethylarsino)­benzene], which shows an unreliable ellipsoid of the N NO atom stretched along the CoNO axis and [CoI 2 (NO)­(PMe 3 ) 2 ] with a large O NO ellipsoid through a crystallographic mirror plane and an unreliably short N–O distance. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In the cases of recently structurally characterized Co-nitrosyl complexes of 12- and 13-membered N-tetramethylated cyclam ligands, [(12-TMC)­Co­(NO)] 2+ and [(13-TMC)­Co­(NO)] 2+ , the Co–N–O angles are 128.5 and 124.4°; whereas, the N–O distances are 1.155 and 1.159 Å, respectively . In Co­(II)-nitrosyl complex of N 1 -(2,4,6-trimethylbenzyl)- N 2 -(2-((2,4,6-trimethylbenzyl)­amino)­ethyl-1,2-diamine ligand having {CoNO} 8 description, the Co–NO distance was reported to be 1.765(10) Å; whereas, the N–O distance and Co–N–O angles were 1.103(9)­Å and 124.6(10)° . In this 5-coordinated square pyramidal Co­(II)-nitrosyl, the NO stretching frequency appeared at 1659 cm –1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In Co­(II)-nitrosyl complex of N 1 -(2,4,6-trimethylbenzyl)- N 2 -(2-((2,4,6-trimethylbenzyl)­amino)­ethyl-1,2-diamine ligand having {CoNO} 8 description, the Co–NO distance was reported to be 1.765(10) Å; whereas, the N–O distance and Co–N–O angles were 1.103(9)­Å and 124.6(10)° . In this 5-coordinated square pyramidal Co­(II)-nitrosyl, the NO stretching frequency appeared at 1659 cm –1 . In FT-IR spectrum of complex 1 , the NO stretching frequency appeared at 1673 cm –1 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…After reporting different reduced products for bis­(oxyanion) complexes coordinated to iron and nickel, we were interested in the reductive deoxygenation of a cobalt complex bearing two nitrogen oxyanion ligands. We hypothesized that the formation of a cobalt dinitrosyl complex was possible; however, most reported Co­(NO) 2 complexes with neutral ancillary donors are monocationic to invoke {Co­(NO) 2 } in the Enemark–Feltham notation. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%