2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-2180(99)00083-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Lewis number on flame front fragmentation in narrow closed channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore to avoid the problems with the inflow/outflow boundary condition one also could consider flames in closed tubes such that these boundaries also have physical no-slip wall conditions (e.g. as in Karlin et al 2000), and study the dependence on the tube lengths. We hence also intend to investigate these types of tube/channel problems in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore to avoid the problems with the inflow/outflow boundary condition one also could consider flames in closed tubes such that these boundaries also have physical no-slip wall conditions (e.g. as in Karlin et al 2000), and study the dependence on the tube lengths. We hence also intend to investigate these types of tube/channel problems in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…consideration of small Lewis numbers, see e.g. [26], could fix the problem too. Table 1 in [24] shows that the range of flame wrinkles, in terms of the semi-apex fold angle α, able to generate a detonation, widens as heat conductivity, represented by thermal diffusivity , grows.…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flame front during propagating event exhibits various shapes such as curved, flat, cusped or cellular fronts [1]- [3]. This is due to the various types of causes such as Lewis number effect, flame-flow interaction, body-force effect, flame front-acoustic wave interaction and so on [4]- [7]. These flames are often transient rather than long-lasting, therefore, we refer their motion as "instability".…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%