Effect of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on intestinal function recovery in patients with early prostate cancer

Wang, Jiawei; Liu, Heqian; Liu, Tao; Liu, Yingqing; Shen, Xudong; Tao, Lingsong

doi:10.23736/s0026-4806.21.07898-8

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Initially, 517 articles were identified, with 239 duplicates removed manually and through software. After screening titles and abstracts, 166 articles irrelevant to the study content were excluded and the remaining 122 articles were read in full, resulting in 15 RCTs, [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] involving a total of 1458 PCa patients, with 729 in the LRP group and 729 in the ORP group. The basic characteristics of the included literature are shown in Table 1.…”

Section: Basic Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy on wound infection of surgery in patients with prostate cancer: A meta‐analysis

Li,

Wan,

Zheng

et al. 2024

International Wound Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This meta‐analysis aims to comprehensively assess the impact of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP) on wound infection in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). A systematic search was conducted, from database inception to November 2023, in EMBASE, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Wanfang and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing LRP with open radical prostatectomy (ORP) in the treatment of PCa. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data and conducted quality assessments based on pre‐defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Stata 17.0 software was employed for data analysis. Overall, 15 RCTs involving 1458 PCa patients were included. The analysis revealed the incidence of wound infection (odds ratio [OR] = 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.16–0.51, p < 0.001) and complications (OR = 0.27, 95% CI = 0.20–0.37, p < 0.001) was significantly lower in the LRP group compared to the ORP group. This study demonstrates that LRP in PCa patients can effectively reduce the incidence of wound infections and complications, indicating significant therapeutic efficacy and justifying its broader clinical application.

show abstract

Section: Basic Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%