2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of land use and soil properties in the feasibility of two sequential extraction procedures for metals fractionation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ese results agree with the findings of Zhou et al [12] and Agrafioti et al [16]. Gabarrón et al [38] and Zimmerman and Weindorf [39] observed that species distribution determines the leachability of heavy metals in stabilized soil. Zhang et al [40] showed that the availability and mobility of heavy metals in soil are related to the content of exchangeable forms.…”
Section: Speciation Distribution Of Cr and Cr(vi) In Stabilizedsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…ese results agree with the findings of Zhou et al [12] and Agrafioti et al [16]. Gabarrón et al [38] and Zimmerman and Weindorf [39] observed that species distribution determines the leachability of heavy metals in stabilized soil. Zhang et al [40] showed that the availability and mobility of heavy metals in soil are related to the content of exchangeable forms.…”
Section: Speciation Distribution Of Cr and Cr(vi) In Stabilizedsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The rest of the metal ions were also sulphate bonded, except for strontium in SARM 18. Trace elements such as Mn and Pb are known to dominate in coal as carbonate or sulphide minerals, hence are easily solubilized in acidic medium 5,31 . The rest of the metal ions were mostly sulphate bonded, except for Sr in SARM 18.…”
Section: Instrumentation the Proposed Sequential Extraction Methods Wmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…spectrometry, conductivity, complexometry) often suffer from the complexity of sample preparation protocols, from interference effects associated with the aqueous matrix containing the element to be measured, or the impossibility to assess the bioavailable metal fraction, which is however essential for a proper estimate of toxicity effects on biota. [2][3][4][5][6] In order to develop reliable methods for a fine monitoring of metals bioavailability and toxicity, the scientific community has resorted to solutions derived from biotechnologies, such as whole-cell microbial biosensors. [7][8][9][10] The latter correspond to genetically modified microorganisms that emit a measurable physical or (electro)chemical signal in the presence of the target metal analyte.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%