1965
DOI: 10.13031/2013.40507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Kind, Amount, and Placement of Residue on Wind Erosion Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The former value (74%) is similar to the efficiency of the 5-m-wide fallow vegetation windbreak (70%) described by Banzhaf et al (1992) and higher than the efficiency of surface mulching (46-64%, as mentioned earlier). This higher efficiency, compared with surface mulching, corresponded to the results in Chepil and Woodruff (1963), Siddoway et al (1965), and Bilbro and Fryrear (1994), which showed that the wind erosion controlling efficiency of standing residue was higher than that of flattened one. The trapping efficiency of the fallow band in this study (74% and 58% for annual incoming soil particles and COM, respectively) was lower than that of the 5-m-wide fallow land in Ikazaki et al (2011b,c) (93% and 97%, respectively).…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…The former value (74%) is similar to the efficiency of the 5-m-wide fallow vegetation windbreak (70%) described by Banzhaf et al (1992) and higher than the efficiency of surface mulching (46-64%, as mentioned earlier). This higher efficiency, compared with surface mulching, corresponded to the results in Chepil and Woodruff (1963), Siddoway et al (1965), and Bilbro and Fryrear (1994), which showed that the wind erosion controlling efficiency of standing residue was higher than that of flattened one. The trapping efficiency of the fallow band in this study (74% and 58% for annual incoming soil particles and COM, respectively) was lower than that of the 5-m-wide fallow land in Ikazaki et al (2011b,c) (93% and 97%, respectively).…”
supporting
confidence: 67%
“…Early methods for modelling the impact of roughness elements on sediment mass flux focused on the establishment of empirical relations between fractional ground cover and sediment transport rates [47,[137][138][139]. During the 1990s, more attention was given to the development of drag partitioning techniques that could establish the wind momentum flux at the soil surface in the presence of roughness elements.…”
Section: Drag Partition Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that soil erosion decreases exponentially as a function of surface residue cover (Chepil, 1944;Siddoway et al, 1965;Fryrear, 1985) (Figure 2A). The effect is largest where residue cover increases from 0 to about 30 per cent while the surface cover factor (which approximates erosion potential) decreases from 1.0 to 0.2.…”
Section: Sugace Residue and Roughness Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%