Abstract:We examined the analgesic effect of racemic ketamine and its 2 enantiomers in 16 female patients (age: 20-29 years) suffering acute pain after oral surgery and in 7 female patients (age: 42-79 years) suffering chronic neuropathic orofacial pain. All 3 forms of ketamine consistently relieved postoperative pain, (S)-ketamine being 4 times more potent than (R)-ketamine. The analgesic effect was maximal 5 min after i.m. injection and lasted for about 30 min. The 7 patients with neuropathic pain received ketamine a… Show more
“…In various studies done by Satilmiş et al [32], Garip et al [33], Gupta et al [36] ketamine has shown to reduce postoperative pain and swelling in patients undergoing surgical removal of third molars and also provide a comfortable procedure for the surgeon and patient. But in contrast Lebrun et al [35] concluded that there was no benefit to pre-emptive administration of ketamine 300 lg/ kg iv whether administered pre-or postoperatively after assessing the effect on 84 patients scheduled for third molar surgical removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently ketamine has been used in oral and maxillofacial surgical practice as well [14,[32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In oral and maxillofacial surgery, Mathisen et al [33] examined analgesic effect of racemic ketamine and its 2 enantiomers in 16 female patients who had their 3rd molar teeth surgically removed on prophylactic indications, under local anaesthesia. The patients received ketamine by intramuscular injection and all three forms of ketamine consistently relieved postoperative pain.…”
Purpose In this study we assessed the clinical efficacy of sub-mucosal injection of ketamine at sub-anesthetic dose of 0.5 mg/kg on post-operative pain, swelling and trismus following surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Methods Forty bilaterally symmetrical impacted mandibular third molars in 20 patients who required surgical removal were included in the study. Within the same individual, one of the sites received a test medication whereas the other site was used as control. All patients received nerve blocks with local anesthetic (2 % lignocaine hydrochloride with 1:80,000 adrenaline); the Test group received sub-mucosal infiltration of 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine hydrochloride (without preservative) around the impacted mandibular third molar and along the incision line, while the Placebo group received normal saline infiltration, 10 min before placement of the incision. Results The pain scores on VAS at 30 min, 1, 4, 12 h and 1 day post-operatively was significantly lower in the Test group than in the Placebo group (p \ .05). With respect to facial swelling and mouth opening the Test group and Placebo group showed overall no statistically significant difference (p [ .05) on the 1st, 3rd and 7th post-operative days. Conclusion The sub-mucosal injection of 0.5 mg/kg ketamine administered before surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars was found to be effective in significantly reducing post-operative pain for the first 24 h.
“…In various studies done by Satilmiş et al [32], Garip et al [33], Gupta et al [36] ketamine has shown to reduce postoperative pain and swelling in patients undergoing surgical removal of third molars and also provide a comfortable procedure for the surgeon and patient. But in contrast Lebrun et al [35] concluded that there was no benefit to pre-emptive administration of ketamine 300 lg/ kg iv whether administered pre-or postoperatively after assessing the effect on 84 patients scheduled for third molar surgical removal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently ketamine has been used in oral and maxillofacial surgical practice as well [14,[32][33][34][35][36].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In oral and maxillofacial surgery, Mathisen et al [33] examined analgesic effect of racemic ketamine and its 2 enantiomers in 16 female patients who had their 3rd molar teeth surgically removed on prophylactic indications, under local anaesthesia. The patients received ketamine by intramuscular injection and all three forms of ketamine consistently relieved postoperative pain.…”
Purpose In this study we assessed the clinical efficacy of sub-mucosal injection of ketamine at sub-anesthetic dose of 0.5 mg/kg on post-operative pain, swelling and trismus following surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars. Methods Forty bilaterally symmetrical impacted mandibular third molars in 20 patients who required surgical removal were included in the study. Within the same individual, one of the sites received a test medication whereas the other site was used as control. All patients received nerve blocks with local anesthetic (2 % lignocaine hydrochloride with 1:80,000 adrenaline); the Test group received sub-mucosal infiltration of 0.5 mg/kg of ketamine hydrochloride (without preservative) around the impacted mandibular third molar and along the incision line, while the Placebo group received normal saline infiltration, 10 min before placement of the incision. Results The pain scores on VAS at 30 min, 1, 4, 12 h and 1 day post-operatively was significantly lower in the Test group than in the Placebo group (p \ .05). With respect to facial swelling and mouth opening the Test group and Placebo group showed overall no statistically significant difference (p [ .05) on the 1st, 3rd and 7th post-operative days. Conclusion The sub-mucosal injection of 0.5 mg/kg ketamine administered before surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars was found to be effective in significantly reducing post-operative pain for the first 24 h.
“…In man, S(+)Ketamine has an anaesthetic-analgesic effect two to four times greater than racemic ketamine (White et al 1985, Mathisen et al 1995, Lauretti et al 2000, and its hyptonic effect is more potent than that of the R(-) isomer (Terra et al 1999), witch allows the use of lower doses of S(+) ketamine when compared to racemic ketamine. Rossetti et al (2008) observed in stallions undergoing castration, a higher analgesic effect of S(+)-ketamine, which was represented by a more stable physiologic parameters during the procedure and also a lower anesthetic requirement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In man, S(+)Ketamine has an anaesthetic-analgesic effect two to four times greater than racemic ketamine (White et al 1985;Mathisen et al 1995;Lauretti et al 2000), and its hyptonic effect is more potent than that of the R(-) isomer (Terra et al 1999), allowing the use of lower doses of S(+) ketamine compared to racemic ketamine.…”
216Pesq. Vet. Bras. 28(4):216-222, abril 2008 RESUMO.-[Anestesia total intravenosa com propofolquetamina racêmica e propofol quetamina-S: estudo comparativo e avaliação hemodinâmica em cães submetidos à ovariohisterectomia.] A anestesia total intravenosa (TIVA) com propofol e quetamina proporciona um efeito muito satisfatório do ponto de vista clínico. Este estudo, cego e randomizado, comparou a indução e manutenção da anestesia com infusão contínua de propofolquetamina racêmica (PRK) e propofol-quetamina-S (PSK) em cães, e avaliou seus efeitos hemodinâmicos, metabó-licos e ventilatórios. Foram avaliadas sete cadelas em cada grupo, submetidas à ovariohisterectomia. A anestesia foi induzida no Grupo PRK, com propofol (4.0mg kg -1 ) e cetamina (2.0mg kg -1 ) por via intravenosa (i.v.), seguida de infusão contínua de propofol (dose inicial de 0.5mg kg -1 min -1 ) e cetamina racêmica(0.2mg kg -1 min -1 ) i.v. No Grupo PSK, a indução anestésica foi com propofol (4.0mg kg -1 ) e cetamina-S (1.0 mg kg -1 ) i.v., seguida de infusão contínua de propofol (dose inicial de 0,5mg kg -1 min -1 ) e Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and ketamine proved to be very satisfactory from a clinical point of view. This blind randomised controlled trial was designed to compare induction and maintenance of anaesthesia under continuous infusion of propofol-racemic ketamine (PRK) with that of propofol-S-ketamine (PSK) and evaluate their haemodynamic, metabolic and ventilatory effects. Seven female dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy were involved in each group. Anaesthesia was induced: in Group PRK, with propofol (4.0mg kg -1 ) and racemic ketamine (2.0mg kg -1 ) intravenous (i.v.), followed by i.v. infusion of propofol (initial dose of 0.5mg kg -1 min -1 ) and racemic ketamine (0.2mg kg -1 min -1 ); in Group PSK, with propofol (4.0mg kg -1 ) and S-ketamine (1.0 mg kg 1 ) i.v., followed by i.v. infusion of propofol (initial dose of 0.5mg kg -1 min -1 ) and S-ketamine (0.1mg kg -1 min -1 ). Parameters were assessed before anaesthesia and in 6 time points after induction. In both groups, heart rate increased significantly at all time points. There was a slight decrease in systemic blood pressure, cardiac output and cardiac index in both groups. The systolic index decrease significantly and intense respiratory depression was observed in all groups, making assisted ventilation necessary. Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol-racemic ketamine and propofol-S-ketamine 217 cetamina-S ( 0.1mg kg -1 min -1 ) i.v. Os parâmetros foram observados antes da anestesia e em seis momentos após a indução anestésica. Em ambos os grupos, a freqüência cardíaca elevouse significantemente em todos os momentos. Houve pequena redução na pressão arterial sistêmica, débito cardíaco e índice cardíaco. O índice sistólico apresentou redução significante e houve intensa depressão respirató-ria em ambos os grupos. A anestesia total intravenosa com a associação do propofol à cetamina racêmica ou à cetamina-S proporciona boa estabilidade hemodinâmic...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.