2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cryogenics.2020.103046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Joule-Thomson pressure drop on a cryogenic three fluid heat exchanger with two communications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
3
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…His model presented results for the JT pressure drop. The validation of the present model with Chodankar et al (2020) shows a good match, as shown in Figure 2(b). Hence, the model is validated and now we can confidently take up further investigations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…His model presented results for the JT pressure drop. The validation of the present model with Chodankar et al (2020) shows a good match, as shown in Figure 2(b). Hence, the model is validated and now we can confidently take up further investigations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The effectiveness is calculated from the output temperature of hot fluid, which results in є = 0.48 for the present code, and for Quadir et al (2013) study, it is є = 0.47, which gives a good match. For the second validation, we consider a numerical model designed by Chodankar et al (2020). His model presented results for the JT pressure drop.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…They considered different refrigeration components and the charge composition of mixtures for the study. Vishnudas et al 24 investigated the JT effect on a three-fluid-two communication HX and concluded that the positive JT effect results in higher values of effectiveness and the negative JT effect results in lower values of effectiveness. Vishnudas et al 25 investigated the JT effect on a three-stream-three contact HX considering only for H 1 parameter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%