2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2016.05.317
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of joint pathology, surface preparation and fixation methods on union frequency after first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: A systematic review of the English literature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Various studies have shown the biomechanical superiority of plates to other fixation devices such as Steinmann pins and variable pitch screws, though there is no significant difference in union rates between fixation with the different varieties of plates and screws [11,17,28,31]. After the success of plating techniques at large in the field of orthopaedics, locking plates were developed and began to rapidly increase in popularity in the early-to-mid 2000s due to their advantages of built-in compression, establishing rigidity, and minimizing screw loosening as well as causing less disruption of the underlying cortical bone (Figure 4).…”
Section: Platesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various studies have shown the biomechanical superiority of plates to other fixation devices such as Steinmann pins and variable pitch screws, though there is no significant difference in union rates between fixation with the different varieties of plates and screws [11,17,28,31]. After the success of plating techniques at large in the field of orthopaedics, locking plates were developed and began to rapidly increase in popularity in the early-to-mid 2000s due to their advantages of built-in compression, establishing rigidity, and minimizing screw loosening as well as causing less disruption of the underlying cortical bone (Figure 4).…”
Section: Platesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result of successful outcomes, first MTP arthrodesis has become a standard procedure in the treatment of disorders of the forefoot and first ray [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Various recent studies have reported fusion rates ranging from 88% to 100% with low revision rates and patient satisfaction scores ranging from 73% to 100% [1,17]. Over time, there has been an evolution in the types of implants used in first MTP arthrodesis as the procedure's use and popularity have increased, from simple screw fixation to more recently developed plates with continuous compression.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roukis [ 15 ] performed a systematic review of 2818 FMPJ arthrodesis procedures finding an overall union rate of 94.6% and complication incidence of 6.1% for malunion and 8.5% for metalwork removal. Korim et al [ 17 ] also conducted a systematic review of 2059 FMPJ arthrodesis procedures obtaining an overall union rate of 93.5% and a 7.5% complication rate, consisting of only metalwork removal. Both systematic reviews focused only on union rate and complications, disregarding patients’ functional outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The union frequency was 93.5 % (1923/2059). The union frequencies were significantly higher when low velocity joint preparation methods were used (p < 0.0001) and the pathology was HR (p = 0.002) [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%