2008
DOI: 10.3324/haematol.12970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of JAK2 V617F on thrombotic risk in patients with essential thrombocythemia: measuring the uncertain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
39
3
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
39
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…26 A meta-analysis on 17 studies that included 2,905 patients showed that the presence of the JAK2 V617F mutation was associated with an increased risk of both venous and arterial thrombosis in patients with essential thrombocythemia. 27 Similar results were published in a retrospective multicenter study involving 239 patients with ET. In that study, previous thrombotic history and the JAK2 V617F mutation were connected to an increased 10-year cumulative rate of thrombohemorrhagic events.…”
Section: Essential Thrombocythemia (Et) Is Manifested Clinical-supporting
confidence: 78%
“…26 A meta-analysis on 17 studies that included 2,905 patients showed that the presence of the JAK2 V617F mutation was associated with an increased risk of both venous and arterial thrombosis in patients with essential thrombocythemia. 27 Similar results were published in a retrospective multicenter study involving 239 patients with ET. In that study, previous thrombotic history and the JAK2 V617F mutation were connected to an increased 10-year cumulative rate of thrombohemorrhagic events.…”
Section: Essential Thrombocythemia (Et) Is Manifested Clinical-supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The role of JAK2 V617F , mutation as independent factor for thrombosis is still debated [7,[16][17][18][19][20]. In our series, we did not find any significant role of JAK2 V617F for predicting thrombosis, but some limit of our analysis should be considered because we cannot exclude that this may reflect an inadequate sample size.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…According to knowledge from analyses done in the past era of the PVSG classification [7], older age ( 60 years) and a history of thrombosis are considered as standard risk factors for thrombosis and guide current treatment decisions [11]. Leukocytosis at diagnosis and the JAK2V617F mutation are suspected as novel disease-associated risk factors for vascular complications [12][13][14]. Recently, the first data on risk factors for thrombosis in WHO-ET were released.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%