1997
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.1997.4764
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Ionic Strength on the Self-Assembly in Mixtures of Phosphatidylcholine and Sodium Cholate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar lack of dependence on ionic strength was recently reported by Meyuas et al for micellar solutions of sodium cholate and lecithin (23). In line with their findings our phase studies suggest that steric interactions also dominate electrostatic interactions in mixed micelles of NaC and GMO.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A similar lack of dependence on ionic strength was recently reported by Meyuas et al for micellar solutions of sodium cholate and lecithin (23). In line with their findings our phase studies suggest that steric interactions also dominate electrostatic interactions in mixed micelles of NaC and GMO.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This can be explained by a reduction of the surface cross-sectional area (of both the phospholipids and the detergent) upon increasing salt concentration by screening of the electrostatic effect, which will lead to an increased packing parameter. In stage II of the solubilization this will give at low salt worm-like micelles whereas at high salt open bilayers are formed as was reported before [35]. An increase of the overall packing parameter could in this case also be put into effect by an increase of the amount of DOPE, which has a packing parameter larger than 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Various methods are applied to study the aggregation behaviour of mixed lipid-detergent systems and MVT processes: time-resolved fluorescence (Das, 1996;Seras 1994), cryotransmission electron microscopy (Meyuhas, 1997;Silvanter, 1996;Seras, 1996), static and dynamic light scattering (Miguel, 1989;Polozova, 1995;Forte, 1998;Egelhaaf 1994), gel exclusion chromatography (Lesieur, 1990), differential scanning calorimetry (Otten, 1995;Forte 1998), NMR (Otten, 1995;Polozova, 1993). Compared to light or neutron scattering (Long, 1994;Pedersen, 1995;Hjelm, 1992;Kiselev, 1999) small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS) is generally not considered as a convenient technique for phospholipid vesicle characterisation (Van Zanten, 1996).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%