1983
DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(83)80120-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of intravenous and intracoronary nifedipine on coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the end of the period of taking the combination of atenolol and nifedipine, 11 patients had a negative exercise test and it was stopped due to fatigue. Twelve patients had positive tests; three stopped due to chest pain, four due to shortness of breath and five due to silent ST segment depression > 2 mm.…”
Section: Effect Of the Fixed Combination Of Atenolol And Nifedipinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the end of the period of taking the combination of atenolol and nifedipine, 11 patients had a negative exercise test and it was stopped due to fatigue. Twelve patients had positive tests; three stopped due to chest pain, four due to shortness of breath and five due to silent ST segment depression > 2 mm.…”
Section: Effect Of the Fixed Combination Of Atenolol And Nifedipinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In clogs, nisoldipine enhanced coronary collateral flow to poststenotic regions with a comparable distribution to the epicardial and endocardial layers [37 I. Whereas in previous clinical studies with intravenous nifedipine coronary blood flow was increased for only a couple of minutes [38,39], in the present study both dosages of nisoldipine caused a prolonged rise in coronary venous oxygen satm'ation, probably clue to a slower dissociation of nisoldipine fl'om the binding site [30,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%
“…The effects of nifedipine on myocardial oxygen consumption vary with the route of administration, and are related to effects on loading conditions, heart rate, and contractility. Following intravenous administration, studies in both humans (26,30) and experimental animals (3) have found no changes in resting myocardial oxygen consumption and either no change or transient minimal reductions in ventricular function (28,33). Following intracoronary administration, however, a significant decrease in regional myocardial oxygen consumption has been noted in both humans (26,29) and experimental animals (35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%