2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2012.00728.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of intraperitoneal or incisional bupivacaine on pain and the analgesic requirement after ovariohysterectomy in dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
56
1
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
3
56
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…; Campagnol et al. ). As IP doses of bupivacaine in human anaesthesia range between 2.0 and 3.5 mg kg −1 (Moiniche et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…; Campagnol et al. ). As IP doses of bupivacaine in human anaesthesia range between 2.0 and 3.5 mg kg −1 (Moiniche et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…One study comparing IP and INC bupivacaine revealed lower pain scores with IP bupivacaine during the first hour after surgery and a trend towards a decreased need for rescue analgesia (Campagnol et al. ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,[13][14][15][16] Intraperitoneal administration of bupivacaine can reduce pain scores and blunt surgery-induced stress responses in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. [17][18][19] The technique has been recommended by a panel of experts as an adjuvant technique for pain relief in dogs and cats undergoing abdominal surgery. 20 However, to the authors' knowledge, no studies have been conducted on the pharmacokinetics of bupivacaine after IP administration to cats.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there was a trend for a decreased need for rescue analgesia in the IP bupivacaine group, this was not significantly different between saline and bupivacaine treatments, most likely due to small sample size and scoring systems used for acute pain assessment (Campagnol et al . ). Based on these findings, the WSAVA‐GPC suggests that the IP route of administration should be given priority over the incisional technique when maximum recommended doses and volumes of local anaesthetics are used, to avoid toxicity.…”
Section: Canine Studiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…, Campagnol et al . , Benito et al . , , ), this technique should be readily applied in sterilisation programs, especially in countries with limited drug availability. They should always be performed under strict aseptic conditions and general anaesthesia.…”
Section: Indications For Ip and Incisional Anaesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%