2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-017-1297-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of interstitial and substitution alloying elements on the intrinsic stacking fault energy of nanocrystalline fcc-iron by atomistic simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent experiments have shown that the underlying cause of the unique combination is the change in the deformation mechanisms from slip to twinning to transformation-induced plasticity [9][10][11][12][13][14]. These mechanism changes have been directly correlated to the stacking fault energy (SFE) of alloys, where it is observed that lowering the SFE favors the sequential change in the deformation mechanisms [9,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Li et al [20] experimentally showed this phenomenon in Fe 80−x Mn x Co 10 Cr 10 , where the change in Mn from 45% to 30% resulted in the sequential observation of three deformation mechanisms with simultaneous decrease in SFE and increase in both strength and ductility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent experiments have shown that the underlying cause of the unique combination is the change in the deformation mechanisms from slip to twinning to transformation-induced plasticity [9][10][11][12][13][14]. These mechanism changes have been directly correlated to the stacking fault energy (SFE) of alloys, where it is observed that lowering the SFE favors the sequential change in the deformation mechanisms [9,[13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Li et al [20] experimentally showed this phenomenon in Fe 80−x Mn x Co 10 Cr 10 , where the change in Mn from 45% to 30% resulted in the sequential observation of three deformation mechanisms with simultaneous decrease in SFE and increase in both strength and ductility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A solid based ratio of SIA to PDMS proportional to 1:2 that is, (0.5 wt%) and PDMS (1 wt%) in the coating solution, gives an approximate image of the surface conditions, considering the following assumptions: The distribution of nanoparticles in the PDMS layer is almost uniform. The entire space between the nanoparticles is filled with PDMS. According to DLS test, nanoparticles are completely spherical. From the calculations presented in Table 3, basically, a packing factor higher than 0.74 (which belongs to an FCC lattice configuration) is not possible for uniform sphere particles. Two hypotheses can be suggested: First, due to the particle size distribution, smaller particles may have filled the empty spaces among the larger particles (interstitial substitution), 33 therefore we may face a packing factor as high as 83%. Second, by comparing the volume fraction of SIA nanoparticles and PDMS before mixing (i.e., 83% SIA) with the FCC lattice factor (74%), it can be concluded that some of the nanoparticles most probably have migrated out of the matrix after drying step and formation of the coating layer, as our observations disclosed it.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the calculations presented in Table 3, basically, a packing factor higher than 0.74 (which belongs to an FCC lattice configuration) is not possible for uniform sphere particles. Two hypotheses can be suggested: First, due to the particle size distribution, smaller particles may have filled the empty spaces among the larger particles (interstitial substitution), 33 therefore we may face a packing factor as high as 83%. Second, by comparing the volume fraction of SIA nanoparticles and PDMS before mixing (i.e., 83% SIA) with the FCC lattice factor (74%), it can be concluded that some of the nanoparticles most probably have migrated out of the matrix after drying step and formation of the coating layer, as our observations disclosed it.…”
Section: Edx Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deformation mechanisms of γ mainly depend on the structure stacking fault energy (SFE) [58], which is a function of the chemical composition and temperature [59][60][61]. These mechanisms can be of different types: (a) the displacive SIT/DIT are promoted if SFE <18 mJ m −2 , (b) twinning occurs if SFE is in the range 18-45 mJ m −2 and (c) dislocation glide happens if SFE >45 mJ m −2 [62].…”
Section: Stacking Fault Energymentioning
confidence: 99%