2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2011.11.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of interparticle interactions on size determination of zirconia and silica based systems – A comparison of SAXS, DLS, BET, XRD and TEM

Abstract: Graphical abstractHighlights► The size of amorphous SiO2 nanoparticles coincides for different test methods. ► Different measurement methods deliver different values for crystalline ZrO2 nanoparticles. ► The use of complementary methods is favourable.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
97
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
7
97
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They may be polycrystalline or clusters of many smaller nanocrystallites. [16] They may also be hollow crystals, or crystals containing many defects or have incorporated organic matrix. [17,18] All types of crystal imperfections would lead to extra XRD peak broadening due to microstrain, resulting in a smaller value of crystal size.…”
Section: Crystal Size and Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They may be polycrystalline or clusters of many smaller nanocrystallites. [16] They may also be hollow crystals, or crystals containing many defects or have incorporated organic matrix. [17,18] All types of crystal imperfections would lead to extra XRD peak broadening due to microstrain, resulting in a smaller value of crystal size.…”
Section: Crystal Size and Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SAXS patterns ( Figure 2a) were described by a model combining the unified scattering function of Beaucage [30] (resulting in a radius of gyration R g and a fractal dimension d f ) with a packing factor from a hard sphere model, [31,32] describing the agglomeration of units (distance R HS and hard sphere volume ratio η). The most striking differences are the larger size of Mg 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference in the mean particle diameter from both methods is due to the difference in the measurement techniques; SAXS data results from the electron density contrast between the sample and solvent (Schnablegger and Singh 2013) whereas DLS data are derived from the hydrodynamic diameter of the particles, which depends on the surface morphology of the particles (Lim et al 2013) and any interactions between the particles and the medium (Kätzel 2007). Higher mean nanoparticle diameters from DLS measurements compared to SAXS analysis has previously been reported (Chen et al 2012; Pabisch et al 2012). However, DLS as a cheaper and quicker analysis technique is preferred over SAXS for the analysis of nanoparticles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…According to the TEM image, the mean particle size was 6.4 ± 0.4 nm, which was in accordance with the SAXS data. The higher diameter value obtained from the DLS data compared to SAXS and TEM analysis can be attributed to the effect of the hydrodynamic shell around the particles in solution (Pabisch et al 2012).
Fig.
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%