2016
DOI: 10.1002/2211-5463.12094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of internal cleavage site mutations in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 capsid protein on its structure and function

Abstract: The capsid protein of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 has been found to be a substrate of the retroviral protease in vitro , and its processing was predicted to be strongly dependent on a pH ‐induced conformational change. Several protease cleavage sites have been identified within the capsid protein, but the importance of its cleavage by the viral protease at the early phase of infection is controversial. To confirm the relevance of this process, we aimed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 65 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Enzymes containing stabilizing mutations, such as the HIV-1 PR5 [56][57][58][59][60] and HTLV-1 PR3 [34,35,39,61,62] are used in in vitro assays; therefore, we investigated precursors of stabilized proteases, as well. The stabilized enzymes showed considerably lower mutations tolerance, the number of non-processing mutants was higher in case of the HIV-1 PR5 containing stabilizing mutations as compared to the wild-type (41.7% and 14.3%, respectively), while the wild-type HTLV-1 PR3 was defective for self-processing in almost all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enzymes containing stabilizing mutations, such as the HIV-1 PR5 [56][57][58][59][60] and HTLV-1 PR3 [34,35,39,61,62] are used in in vitro assays; therefore, we investigated precursors of stabilized proteases, as well. The stabilized enzymes showed considerably lower mutations tolerance, the number of non-processing mutants was higher in case of the HIV-1 PR5 containing stabilizing mutations as compared to the wild-type (41.7% and 14.3%, respectively), while the wild-type HTLV-1 PR3 was defective for self-processing in almost all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%