2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.csite.2018.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of interfacial thermal resistance and nanolayer on estimates of effective thermal conductivity of nanofluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At the same time, a great number of models are based on the hypothesis of the presence of a nanostructure of a certain type around the nanoparticles [ 20 , 21 ]. The fluid molecules that are close to the nanoparticles can form an ordered layer, an almost solid structure, called a nanolayer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same time, a great number of models are based on the hypothesis of the presence of a nanostructure of a certain type around the nanoparticles [ 20 , 21 ]. The fluid molecules that are close to the nanoparticles can form an ordered layer, an almost solid structure, called a nanolayer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness is considered to be between . Subsequent research has focused on determining the thickness of the nanolayer and its thermal conductivity [ 21 , 22 , 23 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was reported that the high TC of nanoparticles, Brownian motion and Kapitza resistance all affect the TC of MSBNFs. 25,49 Khodayari et al 50 and Serebryakova et al 51 pointed out that the estimation of ETC of nanofluids significantly depends on the Kapitza resistance formed by phonon scattering at the interface layer. The Kapitza resistance decreases with the increase of nanoparticle diameter, which has the opposite effect on the ETC.…”
Section: Comparison Of Overall Thermophysical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Short-wavelength high-frequency phonons are responsible for the thermal behaviour of nanolayers. Therefore, it can be inferred that the thermal conductivity decreases exponentially across the nanolayer thickness: 44,45 k nl ðrÞ ¼ k * p þ k bf À k * where, m is a real positive value, usually with value of 2 (ref. 45) and r is the radial distance from the surface of the nanoparticle; r p , to the outer boundary of the adsorbed nanolayer; r p + t. In addition, the average thermal conductivity of the nanolayer can be determined as: 44,45 k nl ¼ t…”
Section: Equivalent Thermal Conductivity Of Dispersed Nanoparticlesmentioning
confidence: 99%