2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.istruc.2020.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of interfacial surface preparation technique on bond characteristics of both NSC-UHPFRC and NSC-NSC composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to carry out the experiment comprehensively and efficiently, the specimens were selected by the orthogonal test [ 28 , 29 ]. Some representative points were selected from the comprehensive test.…”
Section: Equipment and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to carry out the experiment comprehensively and efficiently, the specimens were selected by the orthogonal test [ 28 , 29 ]. Some representative points were selected from the comprehensive test.…”
Section: Equipment and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3D numerical finite element model (FEM) is proposed to simulate the bond behavior between the concrete and the UHPFRC plates, and this study reviews the analytical models that can predict the relationship between the maximum bond stress and the slip for the strengthened concrete elements [ 28 ]. The viscous UHPFRC material can fill the pores and the concaves on the NSC surface, causing the shear connectors to enhance the bond performance [ 29 ]. The steel connectors prevented the debonding failure pattern and enhanced both the ultimate failure load and the ductility index [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tayeh [35], Mansour [36], and Fan [37] proposed the split test to examine the UHPC-NC interface bonding strength. As an indirect test method, the split test can overcome the shortcomings of the pull-off test.…”
Section: Split Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te above investigations show that grooving is benefcial to improving the interface shear capacity, but the improvement is limited and some of the experimental results cannot yet reach the requirement of 14 MPa (interface shear strength) specifed by the American Concrete Institute. Mansour and Fayed [26] concluded that the interface shear strengths of UHPC-NC increased by 9-16%, 22-29%, 32-42%, and 41-46% at 3%, 6%, 10%, and 13% of the grooved area, respectively. Increasing the density and scale of the groove and turning the grooves into keyways is another idea to improve the interface shear strength.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%