The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcata.2014.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of interactions between Ni and Mo on catalytic properties of a bimetallic Ni-Mo/Al 2 O 3 propane reforming catalyst

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggests that loading of Ce in the catalyst makes the NiO-alumina interaction stronger, which consequently restricts sintering of active metal in the course of the SRP reaction. 41 This is in agreement with the XRD and TEM (Fig. 4) 43 reported that Ni and Co tend to interact with lanthanides to form a compound with higher anti-sintering ability than the corresponding Ni Co alone, which is in agreement with the stability results during reactor tests for these Ce-promoted catalysts.…”
Section: Response Surface Methods (Rsm)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…This suggests that loading of Ce in the catalyst makes the NiO-alumina interaction stronger, which consequently restricts sintering of active metal in the course of the SRP reaction. 41 This is in agreement with the XRD and TEM (Fig. 4) 43 reported that Ni and Co tend to interact with lanthanides to form a compound with higher anti-sintering ability than the corresponding Ni Co alone, which is in agreement with the stability results during reactor tests for these Ce-promoted catalysts.…”
Section: Response Surface Methods (Rsm)supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Hence, it is expected that less than this percentage of titania could be reduced in the mixed oxide support. In the Mo containing samples, all catalysts showed reduction peaks corresponding to Mo 6+ → Mo 4+ and Mo 4+ → Mo 0 at low temperatures (400-800 K) and high temperatures (>800 K), respectively [48][49][50]. Particularly, for the 5 wt.% Mo catalysts, a peak centered at 740 K corresponded to an easily reducible Mo species, possibly in octahedral coordination [50].…”
Section: Temperature Programed Reductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The TPR profile of 15 and 20 wt.% Mo catalysts presented four signals at 780, 850, 880, and 1000 K. The peaks located between 780 and 900 K could be attributed to the reduction of Mo Oh and a mixture of Mo Oh and Mo Th , respectively. The high temperature peaks (880 and 1000 K) could be caused by the presence of Mo Th and bulk MoO 3 [47,49,50]. The absence of an 850 K peak at 5 and 10 wt.% Mo would indicate that at low Mo loadings, there may not be a notorious mixture of Mo Oh and Mo Th and more Mo Oh was formed when Mo loading was augmented.…”
Section: Temperature Programed Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Propane can also be used as chemical feedstock, for example, upon catalytic conversion to synthesis gas by either partial oxidation or steam reforming. Several catalysts such as Ni, Pt, Rh, or bi‐metals such as Ru‐Ni, Mg‐Ni are used for propane reforming. Rhodium in particular is a very suitable catalyst as shown literature first by Huff et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%