2018
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of intensive multifactorial treatment on vascular progenitor cells in hypertensive patients

Abstract: BackgroundMost hypertensive patients, despite a proper control of their cardiovascular risk factors, have cardiovascular complications, evidencing the importance of controlling and/or reversing target-organ damage. In this sense, endothelial dysfunction has been associated with the presence of cardiovascular risk factors and related cardiovascular outcomes. Since hypertension often clusters with other risk factors such as dyslipemia, diabetes and obesity, in this study we have investigated the effect of intens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, we used flow cytometric marker CD34+/KDR+ cells, in addition to CD34+/CD133+/CD45 null cells, both of which abundantly include EPC lineage 16 , 17 . As a result, a stronger mobilization of both CD34+/CD133+/CD45 null cells and CD34+/KDR+ cells was induced at early stage in the SYNERGY group, compared with the PROMUS group, possibly associated with more favorable vessel healing at late stage after the SNYERGY stent implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present study, we used flow cytometric marker CD34+/KDR+ cells, in addition to CD34+/CD133+/CD45 null cells, both of which abundantly include EPC lineage 16 , 17 . As a result, a stronger mobilization of both CD34+/CD133+/CD45 null cells and CD34+/KDR+ cells was induced at early stage in the SYNERGY group, compared with the PROMUS group, possibly associated with more favorable vessel healing at late stage after the SNYERGY stent implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured circulating CD34 +/CD133 +/CD45 null and CD34 +/kinase insert domain receptor (KDR)+ progenitor cells as EPC linage, using flow cytometry based on a previously described method 16 , 17 with minor modifications. In brief, EDTA-treated peripheral blood (3 ml) was incubated with test reagent or control reagent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,21 In the present study, we used ow cytometric marker CD34+/KDR + cells, in addition to CD34+/CD133+/CD45 null cells, both of which abundantly include EPC lineage. 5,6 As a result, SNYERGY™ stent induced stronger mobilization of both CD34+/CD133+/CD45 null cells and CD34+/KDR + cells at early stage, compared with PROMUS PREMIER™ stent, possibly associated with more favorable vessel healing at late stage after the SNYERGY™ stent implantation. The result of correlation between percent change in CD34+/KDR + cells at early stage and OCT-based neointimal thickness at late stage indicates that CD34+/KDR + cells might predict wound healing response at the stent-injured vessel sites.…”
Section: Vascular Injury and Endothelial Progenitor Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured circulating CD34+/CD133+/CD45 null and CD34+/kinase insert domain receptor (KDR) + progenitor cells as EPC linage, using ow cytometry based on a previously described method 5,6 with minor modi cations. In brief, EDTA-treated peripheral blood (3 ml) was incubated with test reagent or control reagent.…”
Section: Measurement Of Progenitor Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation